You are incorrect as "Reverend" Wright is incorrect.
There will be other judicial trampling of First Amendment Rights to be sure. This is one of them. However, as in Sports, there is no common sense in poking a stick in the other guy's eye, particularly when he is poised, metaphorically speaking...gun loaded and in hand and ready to put a bullet in you.
Is is well understood that a woman, or man, can run themselves into the door jamb and claim to police that the other struck them. The police will then cart the other off to jail with a charge, not proven, of Domestic Abuse. From that point the other's life changes forever. Gun rights not being the least of the "rights" immediately rescinded.
It is becoming judicially "the same", used loosely, for all gun owners, who may be easily charged, not proven, as "Domestic Terrorists". With the Draconian laws being politically pushed today for extended incarceration, immediate rescission of gun rights, defamation of character, etc., a gun owner's "rights" are perilous at best.
The Child Abuse laws, while favorable in their intent, and necessary, can and have been used in claiming abuse, not proven, and by so doing change the life of the other forever. This happens not only between husbands and wives, but also to teachers, clergy, scout masters, etc., to the point that fingerprinting and background checking (both good ideas) is MANDATORY before coaches, school volunteers, day care workers, etc., are allowed to work with our youth.