Author Topic: Romney or Revolution  (Read 1782 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline magooch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6626
Re: Romney or Revolution
« Reply #30 on: April 22, 2012, 04:34:45 AM »
There's already lots of guys dead, or in prison and the Second Amendment has never been in more jeopardy than it is with the commies (Obwana and Holder) in charge.
 
 
Swingem

Offline Dixie Dude

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4129
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romney or Revolution
« Reply #31 on: April 22, 2012, 04:59:30 AM »
If there is not enough supporters for a 3rd party, then I agree with Junior.  Not enough support for a revolution either and it will end in bloodshed.  Romney isn't as bad as you make him out to be.  What most Republicans were against was the second bailout.  It only bailed out the states and cities that were in debt.  Didn't do anything to get people back to work.  If Romney doesn't get the economy moving again, you can vote him out.  At least it can't be as bad as the overreaching of Obama. 

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romney or Revolution
« Reply #32 on: April 22, 2012, 05:00:28 AM »
There's already lots of guys dead, or in prison and the Second Amendment has never been in more jeopardy than it is with the commies (Obwana and Holder) in charge.

And this will change if the republicans manage to elect their gun grabbing, socialist, baby killer?
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline rickt300

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
Re: Romney or Revolution
« Reply #33 on: April 22, 2012, 05:29:49 AM »
If Romney can't get the economy rolling again there will be chaos.
I have been identified as Anti-Federalist, I prefer Advocate for Anarchy.

Offline blind ear

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4156
  • Gender: Male
    • eddiegjr
Re: Romney or Revolution
« Reply #34 on: April 22, 2012, 08:01:47 AM »
If Romney can't get the economy rolling again there will be chaos.
-
The only thing that can prevent an ecconomic crash is for the corporate banking power brokers to keep moveing us toward a one world government. Crashes are part the normal cycle of economies. The bail outs of the banks, houseing and automobile sectors are  socialist moves that have prevented the crash and the return to real values of properties and goods.
-
The current system will continue to prevent new business start ups and growth because of the cost of initial investment for the old and especially the young. ear
Oath Keepers: start local
-
“It is no coincidence that the century of total war coincided with the century of central banking.” – Ron Paul, End the Fed
-
An economic crash like the one of the 1920s is the only thing that will get the US off of the road to Socialism that we are on and give our children a chance at a future with freedom and possibility of economic success.
-
everyone hears but very few see. (I can't see either, I'm not on the corporate board making rules that sound exactly the opposite of what they mean, plus loopholes) ear
"I have seen the enemy and I think it's us." POGO
St Judes Childrens Research Hospital

Offline teddy12b

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3078
Re: Romney or Revolution
« Reply #35 on: April 23, 2012, 02:41:01 AM »
There's already lots of guys dead, or in prison and the Second Amendment has never been in more jeopardy than it is with the commies (Obwana and Holder) in charge.

And this will change if the republicans manage to elect their gun grabbing, socialist, baby killer?

Exactly!!!!!     Having a D-bag with an "R" by his name is no better than having a D-bag with a "D" by his name. We need the first honest president in the history of my lifetime and that's Ron Paul.

Offline 45-70.gov

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7009
  • Gender: Male
Re: Romney or Revolution
« Reply #36 on: April 23, 2012, 03:30:13 AM »
There's already lots of guys dead, or in prison and the Second Amendment has never been in more jeopardy than it is with the commies (Obwana and Holder) in charge.

And this will change if the republicans manage to elect their gun grabbing, socialist, baby killer?

Exactly!!!!!     Having a D-bag with an "R" by his name is no better than having a D-bag with a "D" by his name. We need the first honest president in the history of my lifetime and that's Ron Paul.


having an R after his name does make him better.....but not much


we can want  ron paul or who ever else all we   want
you won't get him,  wanting won't make it happen........
lose sight of reality and you get 4 years  of an un-restrained obumer
with out the need to get re-elected  he will be a tyrant in his final term
obumer  will sekk us out to the united nations
when drugs are outlawed only out laws will have drugs
DO WHAT EVER IT TAKES TO STOP A DEMOCRAT
OBAMACARE....the biggest tax hike in the  history of mankind
free choice and equality  can't co-exist
AFTER THE LIBYAN COVER-UP... remind any  democrat voters ''they sat and  watched them die''...they  told help to ''stand down''

many statements made here are fiction and are for entertainment purposes only and are in no way to be construed as a description of actual events.
no one is encouraged to do anything dangerous or break any laws.

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Romney or Revolution
« Reply #37 on: April 23, 2012, 04:17:28 AM »
teddy12b,  calling republicans blind sheep is what I've been talking about.  third party people have the attitude that if it's not their way, it's wrong.

apparently we're going to hand the election to obama without a fight.
-
Third party people have the attitude that the short term and long term result of electing Romney is no different than electing Obama. ear

The third party needs to start at the local level and build support then they could have a positive affect . As they are they do little but hurt consertive results.
BTW the short term effect would be the zars of departments leaving Washington. The concept of a Nat Police being shelved . Most likely the ground work for a blanced budget would be laid for the long term. It might not be what true consertivtes want but better than what's going on now.
If ya can see it ya can hit it !