Author Topic: Diamondback DB9  (Read 1224 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jmayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 941
Diamondback DB9
« on: February 25, 2012, 10:23:17 AM »
Just got home with my new Diamondback DB9.  I had heard good things about these little guns and found one at a gun show for $380 NIB.  I had the opportunity to handle it next to a Kahr PM9 and though the Kahr felt very well made and solid, after handling the DB it felt big and heavy.  The DB is .80" wide and has a higher grip than the Kahr (which have one of the highest grips of all the subcompacts).  The trigger is lighter and a bit shorter than the Kahr but is just as smooth.  I grabbed a box of cheap S&B 115gr 9mm and stopped at the range on the way home.  It's quite snappy, but in a 9mm this size that is to be expected.  It had 6 FTC's but this was straight from the box and I hadn't stripped it or cleaned it.  The last mag of the 25rds I fired ran fine.  When I got home, I stripped it, polished the feed ramp, and cleaned and lubed it.  Owning a couple of Glocks it was quite familiar internally, though the trigger is like a Kahr.  I weighed it empty with no mag and though the Diamondback website claims 11oz, this one came in at 11 and 5/8oz.  Not enought to squabble over.  I loaded a full mag, dropped one in the pipe and weighed it like I'd carry it and it was only 15 3/4oz!  That's 7 rounds of 9mm under a pound!  Anyway, we'll see how well it functions as it breaks in.  Should prove to be a great little carry gun that I have no excuse not to carry.


Here it is compared to a Glock 22.





Width comparison with the Glock.





Compared to a S&W J frame.



Offline Savage

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4397
Re: Diamondback DB9
« Reply #1 on: February 26, 2012, 08:39:21 AM »
Haven't seen the Diamondback in my area. The reviews I've read have been favorable. I'm not really in the market for a pistol in that class as I already own a couple of P-11s and a PF9 that keeps me pretty well covered in the light small 9mm category. I also own a P32 and a couple of P3ATs. I consider the .32s and .380s to be about max for pocket carry. Anything larger goes on my belt, so the DB9 would be a belt gun for me. The PF9 fills that bill well, as I'm sure the DB9 will for you. I was a little surprised at the price, almost $400! About a $100 more than the Kel Tec.  Maybe it's that much better, time will tell!
Savage
An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last,

Offline jmayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 941
Re: Diamondback DB9
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2012, 06:14:11 AM »
Well, the DB is breaking in nicely.  Shot some 90gr frangible in it and it did just fine.  No malfunctions. . .but you can't be gentle with it - rack the slide hard and push to the target.  I got a box of 115gr Hornady Critical Defense and so far they have done ok.  I had couple of FTC's with them, but I hadn't even put 50rnds through it at that time.  Now that the round count is up over 100 we'll see how they do.

Offline jmayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 941
Re: Diamondback DB9
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2012, 01:22:15 PM »
Well, after several more range sessions with various types of ammo, I sent it back the manufacturer because it wouldn't run 100%.  Got it back and still had the same problem and then the trigger bar broke.  Sent it in again.  When I got it back, I decided to cut my losses and traded it for a slightly used Kahr CW40 that a local shop had. 


Bottom line, I think the DB is just too small for 9mm.  There's not enough material there to allow it to handle a variety of ammo.  I think its a good concept, but for a carry gun, I want reliability.

Offline williamlayton

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15415
Re: Diamondback DB9
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2012, 12:40:15 AM »
Good read---and---good choice, IMO.
Blessings
TEXAS, by GOD