The way I see the dog and pony show

[nw_hunter]

I agree with lazarowitz!

http://www.lewrockwell.com/lazarowitz/lazarowitz56.1.html

[Anna]

I guess NW , they all think its ok if it is a machine that pulls the trigger?  Some pretty dangerous precedence being set there don't you think? Sort of like training a mean attack dog,then blaming it on the dog because he bites your neighbor.

[Anna]

A good article synopsis on how the neocon-neolib factions of the Intervention Party carry on business and the policy of global Tension; and their regard for We-the-People.
Doesn't look good..!
.
.
...TM7

Agreed, it sort of looks like we are nothing more than cannon fodder to them.Correct me if I'm wrong
but what's the common day term they use for that, Collateral Damage ?
That whole article reeks of it, then by publicly bragging about the damage a drone can do almost sounds like they are issuing the world a warning or something.
Sort of like saying my guns bigger and smarter than your gun.  Wow, talk about shades of Terminator.

I have read where the F22 Raptor has been flown pilotless useing the same technology we developed
for the drones.That aircraft can preform spectacular aerial maneuvers anyway,far and above the G forces that a human pilot could withstand.So why not as this article reflects,what's next helicopters or
tanks?Think of all the added armor or stuff you could cram into a tank if you took the human crew element out of it? It could become just one big rolling steel ball with an attitude.

[Anna]

http://www.foxnews.com/tech/2012/11/03/navy-test-fires-missiles-from-robot-boats/?intcmp=features
[
]I'm sure the list goes on, the thing that I wonder Is. As these (things) get more and more
sophisticated what are their spin offs going to be? But since this thread is more about the people behind this and how they are being used. TM7 its like I said,how easy is any accountability going to be to just push that off to it being a machine?Especially if they are not some remote control devise but actually act out of their own programming ?                           

Then who is the programmer and who is responsible for anything they do?As pointed out in this article, did the drone only kill those non combatants in order to aquiere its original targets ? Where collateral damage is acceptable as long as the target]is neutralized?

It would be very easy to blame the machine this way, or to say the civilians were only in the wrong place at the wrong time and the enemy was hiding amoung them. This way you don't have any boots on the ground who have to quickly decide who is a friendly and who isn't. It's the old (kill em all let God sort them out ) mentality. But hay, it was only a machine what do you expect?                                                                                                                               

But you and I know it doesn't work that way,where the public at large may not and will accept that answer because it was just a bunch of Muslims. What I am saying is, if this machine is able to make critical flight adjustments, plot it's course, do a fly by then fire it's weapons.                                                                                                                         

Somewhere a human set it up to do that, it didn't receive its course of action from Sky Net another machine. Not yet anyway in any technology I'm aware of! And if it did then don't we need to know that down here on he ground? As about every LE agency and milllitary outlet are all jumping on the band wagon to get their hands on one of these.                                           

For surveillance or whatever,that's how they started out over in the sand box also. And just look at what they are capable of doing now! As our own government can not restrain itself so much as  to brag about it

P.S. Sorry guys I have an iPad that is attempting to think for itself lol.