« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis  (Read 1942 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« on: February 13, 2013, 09:12:56 AM »
College professor James Tracy used the Sandy Hook  statistical analysis of dead to wounded  that I published on this website two months ago.   Check it out. 


http://memoryholeblog.com/2013/02/09/lone-gunman-storyline-losing-ground/
Logged

Offline Mike in Virginia

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2013, 01:32:39 PM »
What's your point?
Logged

Offline cjclemens

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 580
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2013, 02:53:26 PM »
I'm pretty sure the point was sharing the link, so others could check it out. Actually pretty obvious what the point was. Not sure how you could miss it...
Logged

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2013, 03:01:32 PM »
Quote from: Mike in Virginia on February 13, 2013, 01:32:39 PM
What's your point?

The point was expressly stated in the link:  The rate of fatalities in Sandy Hook was 96%...higher than in any other mass shooting. 
Logged

Offline JonnyReb

  • Trade Count: (89)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1622
  • Where is John Galt?
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2013, 01:54:25 AM »
  Those are some mind boggling stats. Yeah, I agree, the point is pretty clear.  J
Logged
Active trader until 9-11-14 GB

Offline Mike in Virginia

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2013, 02:46:26 AM »
Thank you.  I think if I saw another S/H consipracy thread, I'd throw up. 
Logged

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2013, 02:55:05 AM »
I would ask is it possible that those small bodies could not deal with the shock of being shot at close range like adults could ? Could it also be that with the protected lives most children live today in America they may had no concept of trying to protect themselves with cover if any was aval  or run and make it harder to hit them ?
 This is a very sad thing indeed and it is shameful for either side to advance their agendas by manipulating the evidence or creating doubt in an effort to use a crisis.
Logged
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2013, 04:35:58 AM »
I also don't understand if or if not there was another shooter as there have been conflicting reports . I agree and am glad we don't understand the insane way of thought. If I may , it was interesting in CA. that all possible ways to film the shootout with the ex cop was restricted . Was this an attempt to stop false reports ?
Logged
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Mike in Virginia

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2013, 11:30:19 AM »
So, TM, you're saying a "shoot to kill" was issued to the LAPD weeks ago?  Do you think that order wet out to the entire department, or just those that could keep a secret? 
Logged

Offline Ranger99

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9581
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2013, 01:02:04 PM »
i believe it was abc news, part of the radio
transmission was played. they either said
"burn him! !" or "burn it! !"
Logged
18 MINUTES.  . . . . . .

Offline Mike in Virginia

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Re: Sandy Hook Death/Wounded Analysis
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2013, 11:53:13 AM »
Yep, TM, I'd say you are right.  Shooting at someone not positively identified is reckless at best.  I hope those cops have to answer for it. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »