I have two 30-30 barrels, on a 10" and the other a 14" So far neither are really bad and I shoot the 170 grain bullets out of them. But you know you shot a short rifle with either. I can not really tell the difference between the 170, the 160, and the 150 grain bullets.
Being cheap I went with the 170s as they seem to be the most easy to find in my local stores and seem to be the cheapest compared to the rubber tipped 160's.
There are 125 grain soft points that would be perfect for deer and pronghorn and from what I remember about shooting them out of a rifle 30 some years ago they were easy on the shoulder out of an old Marlin 336.
Now I also have a 14" 44 mag and I cna tell you the 180 grain rounds that I shoot easy out of my revolver are a handgull out of the 14" tube, even my light plinking loads are a surprise out of the longer tube.
I mention this as the 357 Max shooting a 180 grain bullet is similar to the 180 44 mag load in speed. and I think apples to apples the 30-30 has a little more recoil than the 180 grain out of the same length barrel (both barrels are open sights)
The good thing about the 357 Max is that you can shoot 357 Mags out of it and the 158 grain standard Soft points are going to be more than enough for a deer, hog, or pronghorn as long as you do your part.
Pure physics tell you that the 30-30 is going to have more recoil 170 grain bullet at 2300FPS vs 180 grain at 1700 FPS for the Max Again assuming a 14" barrel. The shorter the barrel with the 30-30 to slower the bullet and the less the recoil, but not by much.
But change that to the lighter 125 grain bullets out of the 30-30 and I think you can swap that. but I think is will be marginal for either as to what has more recoil.