Author Topic: USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??  (Read 264 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline powderman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32823
  • Gender: Male
USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??
« on: June 05, 2013, 05:29:16 AM »
http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/humanists-sue-over-war-memorial.html
 
Artist Accuses Air Force of Censoring Christian Art  Posted in Top Stories | 0 comments Artist Accuses Air Force of Censoring Christian Art Jun 4, 2013
 
  By Todd Starnes
The artist whose inspirational painting was removed from an Air Force dining hall because it violated military standards is accusing the Pentagon of censoring Christian art.
 
“On its face, this seems like nothing short of a clear anti-Christian agenda,” said Grant DiCianni, president of Tapestry Productions. His father, Ron, painted the artwork.
“It appears that the Air Force and the Pentagon have undertaken a dangerous war to rid the military of anything that points to Christ and that needs to be brought to light,” DiCianni said.paint
The painting, titled “Blessed are the Peacemakers,” had been installed in a dining hall at Mountain Home Air Force Base in Idaho.
The print was part of a collection created in the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks — to honor the heroes of that day.
It features a modern-day police officer standing in front of a medieval knight. The flag held in the hand of the knight morphs from a medieval coat of arms into the flag of the United States. The word ‘integrity’ is stenciled over the image. The Bible verse referenced is Matthew 5:9, “Blessed are the Peacemakers for they will be named sons of God.”
The painting was removed less than one hour after Military Religious Freedom Foundation founder Mikey Weinstein alerted the Pentagon. They called the painting “repugnant” and an “overt display of Christian nationalism.”
 
Col. Christopher Short, the commander of the 366th Fighter Wing told Fox News the painting violated military regulations governing the free exercise of religion.
“The document states that we will remain officially neutral regarding religious beliefs – neither officially endorsing nor disapproving any faith belief or absence of belief,” he said.
DiCianni said the painting is promoting the idea of integrity in the service of peace.
“It is our belief that this message is one that the modern-day military should be proud to embody – the idea of integrity in the service of peace,” he said. “The military is an embodiment of the ultimate peacemaker, a pursuit blessed in Scripture. It would seem this is a message that the Air Force should be willing to foster, not censor.”
DiCianni said they have yet to be contacted by anyone at the Pentagon or the Air Force – calling the removal of the painting “deeply disturbing.”New Image
“It’s concerning that as we watch the Pentagon and the Obama Administration,” he said. “They have taken a step from respecting all religions to specifically targeting Christianity as a scourge that they seem to want to get rid of.”
 
According to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation, they filed a complaint after more than 20 unidentified service members took issue with the artwork.
One Airman said the picture “made me feel terribly uncomfortable, disheartened and disappointed.”
The Pentagon has a long history of doing the will of Weinstein and the MRFF.
Last April, the Washington Post detailed a private meeting between Weinstein and Pentagon officials about religious proselytizing.
 
Weinstein called religious proselytizing “a NATIONAL SECURITY THREAT??.”
 
“What is happening (aside from sexual assault) is spiritual rape,” he told the newspaper. “And what the Pentagon needs to understand is that it is sedition and treason. It should be punished.”
He called for the military to court martial anyone guilty of religious proselytizing – “you need a half dozen court martials real quick.”
DiCianni said they have the utmost respect for the men and women serving in the military.
“I am certain that this decision does not reflect their values nor does it reflect the beliefs upon which this nation was founded.”
 
DiCianni did marvel at the speed in which the Pentagon reacted to Weinstein’s complaint.
“From what we understand, the authorization for this action and the removal of the print, took less than 60 minutes from start to finish,” he said. “If all those things are accurate, they paint a very chilling picture of an administration who has been unable for months to respond to Christian complaints about things they find offensive, but seem capable of rapid reaction when it comes to things non-Christians find offensive.”

Gen. Jerry Boykin (Ret.) said the censorship raises serious concerns about the Pentagon’s relationship with Weinstein. He noted that it took 56 minutes for the military to respond to Weinstein – but they still haven’t responded to letters sent by members of Congress more than three weeks ago.
 
“We are deeply disturbed that the Pentagon continues to comply with the demands of anti-Christian activists while neglecting to even respond to the concerns expressed by service members, and Members of Congress who simply want to protect the right to share one’s faith,” Boykin said in a prepared statement.
Boykin said the Pentagon’s public statements about religious liberty have been confusing – including one from the Air Force that said service members are allowed to share their faith so long as it doesn’t make others uncomfortable.
 
“The Pentagon’s response within 56 minutes to this censorship demand makes it abundantly clear that the Air Force’s ‘uncomfortable’ standard has been defined to require the censorship of any vestige of Christianity,” Boykin said. “Even a small Scripture reference on a painting honoring our 9/11 heroes can’t escape the reach of religious censors.”
He said the Pentagon’s religious censorship is “having an undeniable chilling effect.”
 
Heres another of a group suing over a war memorial because of a cross and man praying. POWDERMAN.  >:( >:(
 
http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/humanists-sue-over-war-memorial.html
Mr. Charles Glenn “Charlie” Nelson, age 73, of Payneville, KY passed away Thursday, October 14, 2021 at his residence. RIP Charlie, we'll will all miss you. GB

Only half the people leave an abortion clinic alive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAiOEV0v2RM
What part of ILLEGAL is so hard to understand???
I learned everything about islam I need to know on 9-11-01.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDqmy1cSqgo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u9kieqGppE&feature=related
http://www.illinois.gov/gov/contactthegovernor.cfm

Offline Conan The Librarian

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • McDonalds. Blecch!
Re: USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??
« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2013, 05:37:31 AM »
It's all about not rocking the boat. I figure if an organization has time to dwell on stuff like this, they need to be cut by 60% to get them to re-focus on their mission.

Offline yellowtail3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5664
  • Gender: Male
  • Oh father of the four winds, fill my sails!
Re: USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??
« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2013, 05:59:49 AM »
Peacemakers? Knight with a sword? Cop?


Sounds like the 'artist' got his panties in a wad, and wants us to join his discomfiture
Jesus said we should treat other as we'd want to be treated... and he didn't qualify that by their party affiliation, race, or even if they're of diff religion.

Offline Conan The Librarian

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • McDonalds. Blecch!
Re: USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??
« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2013, 06:06:14 AM »
Doing controversial things is a common technique used by various self-proclaimed artists now to increase sales. It works, and really does translate to more money for them.

Offline powderman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32823
  • Gender: Male
Re: USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??
« Reply #4 on: June 05, 2013, 08:31:07 AM »
In the 2nd link and story I bet if the kneeling soldier was on a prayer rug it would have been ok. Ya think?? POWDERMAN.  :o :o
Mr. Charles Glenn “Charlie” Nelson, age 73, of Payneville, KY passed away Thursday, October 14, 2021 at his residence. RIP Charlie, we'll will all miss you. GB

Only half the people leave an abortion clinic alive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAiOEV0v2RM
What part of ILLEGAL is so hard to understand???
I learned everything about islam I need to know on 9-11-01.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDqmy1cSqgo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u9kieqGppE&feature=related
http://www.illinois.gov/gov/contactthegovernor.cfm

Offline yellowtail3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5664
  • Gender: Male
  • Oh father of the four winds, fill my sails!
Re: USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??
« Reply #5 on: June 05, 2013, 09:18:34 AM »
Right-wing, Christian-Nationalist iconography
Jesus said we should treat other as we'd want to be treated... and he didn't qualify that by their party affiliation, race, or even if they're of diff religion.

Offline Hairy Chest

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1485
Re: USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??
« Reply #6 on: June 05, 2013, 10:10:21 AM »
The Left always paints their cause under moral pretenses, 'Humanist', when really it is an attack on white gentile culture.   Adding the Star of David hides the originator of this aggression. 
Study after study has shown how dangerous distracted driving is yet people continue to talk on their cell phones while driving. Driving in the U.S. requires your full attention. Many states and countries have made it illegal to use a cell phone while operating a motor vehicle and the federal government should follow their lead. Banning the use of cell phones while driving would have the added benefit of making the no-texting law enforceable.

Offline Conan The Librarian

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • McDonalds. Blecch!
Re: USAF censors Christian art, a security threat??
« Reply #7 on: June 05, 2013, 10:18:16 AM »
My only issue with this is that "art work" should actually be artistically rendered. This example is just a bunch of visual cliches. Am surprised it wasn't painted on black velvet using Elvis as a model.