Author Topic: The term "Leftist"  (Read 4401 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dwalk

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 551
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #90 on: May 25, 2013, 02:31:26 PM »
the federal govt should NOT be involved in health care,  home mortgages and student loans to name just a few things they have their slimy fingers in...


in fact, IIRC, doesn't the Constitution say what it's "Job" is and it doesn't include those things?
don't squat while wearing your spurs...will rogers

Offline two-blocked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1155
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #91 on: May 26, 2013, 09:04:44 AM »


"I am absolutely saying global warming which had to evolve into climate change is a leftist conspiracy. To blame carbon dioxide for any weather change is faux science. A clear gas does not absorb or trap heat. Co2 is an absolutely necessary element, one of the building blocks of life. It is not  a greenhouse gas because it traps heat, it is because plants breathe it and release oxygen. This accelorates plant growth and improves our atmosphere. The amazing part is that this fact is available to anyone who cares to look but the Pied Piper has scores of morons ready to follow him. Morons can't think for themselves. The satisfied ignorant are another big group."
 
I can tell you have a keen analytical mind and a demonstrated interest in science. When you get to high school (even middle school if you are lucky) you're going to be blown away by things like physics, chemistry, geology and earth science.  Til then here's a little preview:
 
1. CO2 is affecting the "climate" which is in turn affecting the "weather". You'll learn about the difference.
2. There's lots of things out there we can't see but impact our lives. One of those is long wave length heat radiation. It interacts with the "invisible" CO2 and is the reason we're experiencing "anthropomorphic" climate change
3. CO2 is not an element, it's a molecule. Molecules are made of elements. It's really cool how they bond with "invisible" forces
4. CO2 concentration has gone from 280 ppm (that's parts per million) to 400 ppm in the last 150 years. Where's the predicted increase in plant growth? You're probably aware that none of those morons in climate change denial have been able to explain this.
 
Can't wait?  Here's a great place to start:
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basics/
 
Good Luck!
 

 

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #92 on: May 26, 2013, 11:18:10 AM »
Quote
I can tell you have a keen analytical mind and a demonstrated interest in science. When you get to high school (even middle school if you are lucky) you're going to be blown away by things like physics, chemistry, geology and earth science.  Til then here's a little preview:

That's nice! When you have no real argument, try to belittle the opposition. ::)

All of the supposed "facts" you have presented have also been refuted..........by scientists all over the globe. You can find both sides of the story regarding "global warming/climate change" with a quick search on the web. And you will find the almost without expception, the more liberal of the bunch tend to be promoting the theory that man is responsible. Well.....I have almost never found anything else that I approve of coming from the leftists, so why would I believe them on this?

Truth is, climate changes.......period! It has changed before and it will again. In fact it has changed so fast before that we still find frozen animals that have been extinct for centuries........with buttercups in their mouth. Now how do you suppose that happened? Ya reckon we caused that with our power plants and SUVs?
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline mcwoodduck

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7983
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #93 on: May 26, 2013, 05:43:39 PM »
The people making the MOST money in the current corpo-communist companies are non producers and demand more and more from their employees while giving them less and less, so I agree with you. We have entire corpo-communist companies that produce nothing, and steadily get richer! How long can that last? (Historically, about 15-20 years before the resulting recessions have forced things to change--- usually by starting another war and raising taxes on the middle class.)
What is it exactly that you produce?  What worth are you to the economy in producing?
I can see that someone that saves has a worth to the economy and offers capital for the private industry to use and repay. 

Offline mcwoodduck

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7983
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #94 on: May 26, 2013, 06:03:42 PM »


 When you get to high school (even middle school if you are lucky) you're going to be blown away by things like physics, chemistry, geology and earth science.  Til then here's a little preview: 
I was taught the scientific method when I went through science in grade school, Jr. High School, High School and college.  The Man made global warming people are not using these methods to prove their hypothesis.   
 

4. CO2 concentration has gone from 280 ppm (that's parts per million) to 400 ppm in the last 150 years. Where's the predicted increase in plant growth? You're probably aware that none of those morons in climate change denial have been able to explain this.
My question is what was used ot collect the PPM data of today and what was used to collect the data of CO2 data 150 years ago?  Where were the readings 150 years ago?  What times of the year, and day were the readings? 
My guess is that 150 years ago what ever method was used to collect the data is was a crude method, and had a margin of error.  and that today we have very accurate ways to tell the make up of an iar sample.  But you can not compare instrumnets and methods of 150 years ago to today?  Again scientific method and the lack there of with the man made global warming people.  Sorry when you hit Grade school maybe someone will explain to you the scientific method and how you have ot use the same data collection to prove or disprove.
It would be like running a 4" net through the ocean and and counting the fish in the net, then running a 1" net through the ocean a year later and saying that the ocean has 3X the life in it that it did a year ago.  Is it true, is it not, no one knows based on faulty data collection.  And until they can tell doublicate the collection of the original data there data is flawed either by design or stupidity. 
 
Can't wait?  Here's a great place to start:
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basics/
 So if it rains more it is man made global warming, if it rains less it is man made global warming if it rains the same it is man made global warming.  Have you ever heard the term "Rain Making"  Pay me and I will make it rain, no rain and you simply did not pay enough, pay more and I can make it rain, oh still no rain, we must need more money and I can make it rain, till it finally rains.  Sound familiar?  It is climate change and I need money to study it and reverse it,  Oh we need more to study it more and here is what we found so far, the CO2 is heating the earth, oh wait the actual temps are cooling.... Well we need more $ to study and change the name to climate change  and make up some data showing that the CO2 levels have increased. 
Good Luck!

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31288
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #95 on: May 27, 2013, 12:33:06 AM »
  The following article perhaps illustrates "circular reasoning" or often, the lack of reasoning of the "global warming" crowd...
                                                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
                                        They are not light bulbs, they are dark suckers
      For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proved otherwise. Electric bulbs don't emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we call these bulbs Dark Suckers.

The Dark Sucker Theory and the existence of dark suckers prove that dark has mass, is heavier than light, and is faster than light.

First, the basis of the Dark Sucker Theory is that electric bulbs suck dark. For example, take the Dark Sucker in the room you are in. There is much less dark right next to it than there is elsewhere. The larger the Dark Sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark. Dark Suckers in the parking lot have a much greater capacity to suck dark than the ones in your room.

As it is with all things, Dark Suckers don't last forever. Once they are full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is proven by the dark spot on a full Dark Sucker. A candle is a primitive Dark Sucker. A new candle has a white wick. You can see that after the first use, the wick turns black, representing all the dark that has been sucked into it. If you put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle, it will turn black. This is because it got in the way of the dark flowing into the candle. One of the disadvantages of these primitive Dark Suckers is their limited range.

There are also portable Dark Suckers. In these, the bulbs can't handle all the dark by themselves and must be aided by a Dark Storage Unit. When the Dark Storage Unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced before the portable Dark Sucker can operate again.

Dark has mass. When dark goes into a Dark Sucker, friction from the mass generates heat. Thus, it is not wise to touch an operating Dark Sucker. Candles present a special problem as the mass must travel into a solid wick instead of through clear glass. This generates a great amount of heat and therefore it's not wise to touch an operating candle.

Also, dark is heavier than light. If you were to swim just below the surface of the lake, you would see a lot of light. If you were to slowly swim deeper and deeper, you would notice it getting darker and darker. When you get really deep, you would be in total darkness. This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the lake and the lighter light floats at the top. That is why it is called light.

Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to stand in a lit room in front of a closed, dark closet, and slowly opened the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet. But since dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave the closet.

Next time you see an electric bulb, remember that it is really a Dark Sucker.

 
 
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Offline DDZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6154
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #96 on: May 27, 2013, 04:56:58 AM »
"Dark Suckers" Haa...Haa..  ;D Be careful this could start a new cult. 
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.    Wm. Penn

Offline mcwoodduck

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7983
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #97 on: May 27, 2013, 05:06:01 AM »
Is that why a flashlight beam in cone shaped it pulls the dark into the cone shape of the bulb (what I used ot call the reflector) now understand it is a collector.  And the srtronger the bulb the further away it can pull the dark matter.  Is it that Dark have a magnetic quality or is it that they are gravitational and a used battery is now full of dark matter and can not absorb any more? 
Can we use the battereis that are full of Dark matter to fuel space ships headed to Marz or beyond?
Interesting, can you use the scientific method to prove it? Or is it PFM like Man made global warming?

Offline rickt300

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #98 on: June 04, 2013, 01:34:31 PM »


"I am absolutely saying global warming which had to evolve into climate change is a leftist conspiracy. To blame carbon dioxide for any weather change is faux science. A clear gas does not absorb or trap heat. Co2 is an absolutely necessary element, one of the building blocks of life. It is not  a greenhouse gas because it traps heat, it is because plants breathe it and release oxygen. This accelorates plant growth and improves our atmosphere. The amazing part is that this fact is available to anyone who cares to look but the Pied Piper has scores of morons ready to follow him. Morons can't think for themselves. The satisfied ignorant are another big group."
 
I can tell you have a keen analytical mind and a demonstrated interest in science. When you get to high school (even middle school if you are lucky) you're going to be blown away by things like physics, chemistry, geology and earth science.  Til then here's a little preview:
 
1. CO2 is affecting the "climate" which is in turn affecting the "weather". You'll learn about the difference.
2. There's lots of things out there we can't see but impact our lives. One of those is long wave length heat radiation. It interacts with the "invisible" CO2 and is the reason we're experiencing "anthropomorphic" climate change
3. CO2 is not an element, it's a molecule. Molecules are made of elements. It's really cool how they bond with "invisible" forces
4. CO2 concentration has gone from 280 ppm (that's parts per million) to 400 ppm in the last 150 years. Where's the predicted increase in plant growth? You're probably aware that none of those morons in climate change denial have been able to explain this.
 
Can't wait?  Here's a great place to start:
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basics/
 
Good Luck!

Carbon dioxide (Co2) is a bonding of carbon and oxygen done so by invisible forces.
I have been identified as Anti-Federalist, I prefer Advocate for Anarchy.

Offline mcwoodduck

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7983
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #99 on: June 04, 2013, 02:02:02 PM »


"I am absolutely saying global warming which had to evolve into climate change is a leftist conspiracy. To blame carbon dioxide for any weather change is faux science. A clear gas does not absorb or trap heat. Co2 is an absolutely necessary element, one of the building blocks of life. It is not  a greenhouse gas because it traps heat, it is because plants breathe it and release oxygen. This accelorates plant growth and improves our atmosphere. The amazing part is that this fact is available to anyone who cares to look but the Pied Piper has scores of morons ready to follow him. Morons can't think for themselves. The satisfied ignorant are another big group."
 
I can tell you have a keen analytical mind and a demonstrated interest in science. When you get to high school (even middle school if you are lucky) you're going to be blown away by things like physics, chemistry, geology and earth science.  Til then here's a little preview:
 
1. CO2 is affecting the "climate" which is in turn affecting the "weather". You'll learn about the difference.
2. There's lots of things out there we can't see but impact our lives. One of those is long wave length heat radiation. It interacts with the "invisible" CO2 and is the reason we're experiencing "anthropomorphic" climate change
3. CO2 is not an element, it's a molecule. Molecules are made of elements. It's really cool how they bond with "invisible" forces
4. CO2 concentration has gone from 280 ppm (that's parts per million) to 400 ppm in the last 150 years. Where's the predicted increase in plant growth? You're probably aware that none of those morons in climate change denial have been able to explain this.
 
Can't wait?  Here's a great place to start:
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basics/
 
Good Luck!

Carbon dioxide (Co2) is a bonding of carbon and oxygen done so by invisible forces.
Those invisible forces are called Ionic and Covalient bonds.

Offline dukkillr

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3428
    • The Daily Limit
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #100 on: June 04, 2013, 06:15:24 PM »


"I am absolutely saying global warming which had to evolve into climate change is a leftist conspiracy. To blame carbon dioxide for any weather change is faux science. A clear gas does not absorb or trap heat. Co2 is an absolutely necessary element, one of the building blocks of life. It is not  a greenhouse gas because it traps heat, it is because plants breathe it and release oxygen. This accelorates plant growth and improves our atmosphere. The amazing part is that this fact is available to anyone who cares to look but the Pied Piper has scores of morons ready to follow him. Morons can't think for themselves. The satisfied ignorant are another big group."
 
I can tell you have a keen analytical mind and a demonstrated interest in science. When you get to high school (even middle school if you are lucky) you're going to be blown away by things like physics, chemistry, geology and earth science.  Til then here's a little preview:
 
1. CO2 is affecting the "climate" which is in turn affecting the "weather". You'll learn about the difference.
2. There's lots of things out there we can't see but impact our lives. One of those is long wave length heat radiation. It interacts with the "invisible" CO2 and is the reason we're experiencing "anthropomorphic" climate change
3. CO2 is not an element, it's a molecule. Molecules are made of elements. It's really cool how they bond with "invisible" forces
4. CO2 concentration has gone from 280 ppm (that's parts per million) to 400 ppm in the last 150 years. Where's the predicted increase in plant growth? You're probably aware that none of those morons in climate change denial have been able to explain this.
 
Can't wait?  Here's a great place to start:
http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/basics/
 
Good Luck!

Carbon dioxide (Co2) is a bonding of carbon and oxygen done so by invisible forces.
Those invisible forces are called Ionic and Covalient bonds.
Just covalent bonds on CO2.

Offline ChungDoQuan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1417
  • Eisenhower Conservative
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #101 on: June 05, 2013, 04:30:43 AM »
The people making the MOST money in the current corpo-communist companies are non producers and demand more and more from their employees while giving them less and less, so I agree with you. We have entire corpo-communist companies that produce nothing, and steadily get richer! How long can that last? (Historically, about 15-20 years before the resulting recessions have forced things to change--- usually by starting another war and raising taxes on the middle class.)
What is it exactly that you produce?  What worth are you to the economy in producing?
I can see that someone that saves has a worth to the economy and offers capital for the private industry to use and repay.


If I DON'T do my job at the hospital, some people have to wait to be treated, maybe too long--- I guess you could say if I DON'T do my job, I produce corpses. If I don't treat the patients in my clinic, people miss work, among other things, so I guess you could say if I don't do that, whatever those people make doesn't get produced. If I stop writing, something else I get paid to do, people remain uneducated, like many people who post here, so if I don't do that, I produce ignorance. There is no fix for fools.
If you give up, THEY don't have to win.

"'Cause what they do in Washington, they just take care of number 1. And number 1 ain't you. $__t, you ain't even number 2!" Frank Zappa

The greatest idea the right ever had is personal responsibility; the greatest idea the left ever had is social responsibility. Both take effort.

The Founding Fathers had complete access to the Bible, but they came up with the Constitution as our governing document.

Offline ChungDoQuan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1417
  • Eisenhower Conservative
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #102 on: June 05, 2013, 04:37:12 AM »
IG, I worked as a Motorola communications field engineer years ago. (radio tech!) I am familiar with the Dark Sucker proposal. It's actually no different from the "hole theory" of transistor gate operation. In fact, on schematics , bulbs are often designated as "DS101" ,etc. Even in electronics, science is not an exact science!
If you give up, THEY don't have to win.

"'Cause what they do in Washington, they just take care of number 1. And number 1 ain't you. $__t, you ain't even number 2!" Frank Zappa

The greatest idea the right ever had is personal responsibility; the greatest idea the left ever had is social responsibility. Both take effort.

The Founding Fathers had complete access to the Bible, but they came up with the Constitution as our governing document.

Offline rickt300

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #103 on: June 05, 2013, 05:42:14 AM »
Getting away from topic a bit I see.
I have been identified as Anti-Federalist, I prefer Advocate for Anarchy.

Offline mcwoodduck

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7983
  • Gender: Male
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #104 on: June 05, 2013, 06:22:18 AM »
The people making the MOST money in the current corpo-communist companies are non producers and demand more and more from their employees while giving them less and less, so I agree with you. We have entire corpo-communist companies that produce nothing, and steadily get richer! How long can that last? (Historically, about 15-20 years before the resulting recessions have forced things to change--- usually by starting another war and raising taxes on the middle class.)
What is it exactly that you produce?  What worth are you to the economy in producing?
I can see that someone that saves has a worth to the economy and offers capital for the private industry to use and repay.


If I DON'T do my job at the hospital, some people have to wait to be treated, maybe too long--- I guess you could say if I DON'T do my job, I produce corpses. If I don't treat the patients in my clinic, people miss work, among other things, so I guess you could say if I don't do that, whatever those people make doesn't get produced. If I stop writing, something else I get paid to do, people remain uneducated, like many people who post here, so if I don't do that, I produce ignorance. There is no fix for fools.
Tell your self what you want. 
Doctors will still treat people, you are just part of the red tape that clogs the efficient use of hospital staff.  how many nurses or docrtor's asistants can be hired to treat people if we did not have to hire people like you that create red tape?
As far as what you write, you are not teaching anyone you are passing on misinformation and socialist propaganda.  You write as if the world were perfect and that people were not selfish, much like a 6 year old that has simple answers.  But I can see that you want to Justify you job as being part of society and not a drain on it.  But then again the drains on society never see them selves as a drain and see other drains on society and the economy as needed. 

Offline dukkillr

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3428
    • The Daily Limit
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #105 on: June 05, 2013, 06:39:04 AM »
Getting away from topic a bit I see.
I agree.  If you two want to debate who drinks what, and who is a drain on what, please do so by PM.

Offline two-blocked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1155
Re: The term "Leftist"
« Reply #106 on: June 05, 2013, 07:01:41 AM »
Getting away from topic a bit I see.
I agree.  If you two want to debate who drinks what, and who is a drain on what, please do so by PM.

That would be a polar covalent bond.  ;)