Cognitive dissonance is the discomfort experienced when simultaneously holding two or more conflicting beliefs, and as you'd expect, the pro-choice movement would like to avoid the discomfort so they must ignore all data related to one belief, which for many is that it would be wrong to harm, maim or kill a child, in order to hold the other - choice trumps all.
[/size]I work around young parents daily; for the one who wants it, its a baby "Chaps, I just took a pee test, and I'm pregnant - I'm having a baby!" Same day, different girl "Chaps, I just took a pee test, and I'm pregnant. I want to abort the fetus." There are no biological differences of fact between the two - the language is subjective to the attitude of the observer. With advances in 3D sonography, factual evidence dispelling the old developmental theories grow exponentially everyday that the baby is far more viable, conscious, and feeling at earlier stages than previously imagined, which means that science is presently the strongest argument against the myth that abortion is just the passive destruction of unfeeling tissue. The choice movement is losing its ground as the medical evidence mounts placing the choice of the mother directly in the light of killing a child, which is known and is why the various morning after solutions have risen to the fore. These solutions do not provide the industry the lucrative medical cells for research, etc. so they'll keep it up as long as they can, but all indicators point to an end to the "fetus boom."
[/color]
[/size][/color]