Author Topic: Smart guns, will only fire in owners hands. More liberal democrat stupidity.  (Read 627 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline powderman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32823
  • Gender: Male
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/02/20/dem-bill-would-require-all-new-guns-be-personalized/
 
 'Smart' gun control? Dem bill would require all new guns be 'personalized'Published February 20, 2014FoxNews.com            Beretta_gun.jpg                   FILE: March 2009: A man looks at Beretta guns during the International Guns Exhibition and Outdoor Classics in Nuremberg, Germany.REUTERSSen. Edward Markey has unveiled a gun control bill he says will help reduce firearm violence by requiring all new guns be "personalized" with special features, such as fingerprint-reading technology, so they can only be fired by their owners or other authorized users.
The Massachusetts Democrat says the bill will make it harder for stolen guns to be used in crimes and will reduce accidental firearm deaths by making it impossible for children to fire guns they find Markey said technology already exists to make guns inoperable for unauthorized users. “In the 21st century, we should use advances in technology to our own advantage and save lives, and the [bill] will help ensure that only authorized users can operate handguns," Markey said in a statement. "This is the type of gun safety legislation that everyone – regardless of political party or affiliation – should be able to support.”
 
Markey, who detailed the bill Wednesday, also called on President Obama to include $10 million in his budget proposal for gun violence research. 
Markey said his bill should be embraced by gun owners and safety advocates, but any gun control measure will likely come up against tough opposition in Congress.
 
Rep. John Tierney, D-Mass., introduced the same legislation in House last year.
“This vital legislation, which I introduced in the House last year, harnesses the benefits of existing technology to make guns themselves safer. Personalization technology would reduce accidental gun deaths and prevent stolen weapons from being used in crimes," Tierney said in a statement.
According to The Washington Post, a German company, Armatix GmbH, recently introduced the first "personalized" handgun in the U.S. The Amatrix iP1, a .22-caliber pistol, will only fire if it is within range of a special watch that communicates with the gun.
Meanwhile, Utah-based Kodiak Arms is taking pre-orders for the Intelligun, which is unlocked with fingerprints. Yardarm, a California start-up, uses a smartphone app to notify gun owners if their weapon is moved and allows them to remotely disable their firearms, The Post reported.
 
The National Rifle Association's Institute for Legislative Action says it is not opposed to the development of so-called "smart guns," but rejects government mandates that require the use of grips with fingerprint-reading technology, according to a post on its website.
"[The] NRA recognizes that the "smart guns" issue clearly has the potential to mesh with the anti-gunner's agenda, opening the door to a ban on all guns that do not possess the government-required technology," the group said.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.
Mr. Charles Glenn “Charlie” Nelson, age 73, of Payneville, KY passed away Thursday, October 14, 2021 at his residence. RIP Charlie, we'll will all miss you. GB

Only half the people leave an abortion clinic alive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAiOEV0v2RM
What part of ILLEGAL is so hard to understand???
I learned everything about islam I need to know on 9-11-01.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDqmy1cSqgo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u9kieqGppE&feature=related
http://www.illinois.gov/gov/contactthegovernor.cfm

Offline tom548

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (51)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 693
  • Gender: Male
Do you think the low life people in Washington would missuse a law once it was passed? OH YEAH!

Offline m-g Willy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1739
Another "feel good" solution that would do nothing! ::)
How long would it take to disable this so called "safety " device ?
2min?
30 at the most?

Offline rkeltner

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 92
  • Gender: Male
they would make it illegal to tamper with the mechanism...like that would matter to a criminal! but it WOULD make it easier to slip in an anti self gunsmithing law later on,. you know.... gun owners, an the average aren't smart enough to make improvements or modifications to their weapons. yeah, right!

Offline spruce

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2248
  • Gender: Male
A replay from the Clinton era.  S&W paid the price for getting in bed with the government on the first go-round. 
 
Main objectives are to drive the price of guns up to where the average person won't be able to afford them and to clear the way for the governemnt to confiscate all non-compliant guns.

Offline mcwoodduck

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7983
  • Gender: Male
Fine, Capital hill police have to have them issued to them as well as the Presidential protection detail of the Secret service.  If they are good enough to protect the law makers and president, and show they are proven technology then they can be sold to protect me and my family.  Same with micro stamping and any other new safe technology that we are forced to use by these people.