Perhaps Loader feels that UFOs are from another place, but not Outer Space. Perhaps he believes, as some do, that they are more closely aligned with what we perceive to be The Evil One than the Benevolent One.
Myself, I don't believe this.
I believe that UFOs are (1) machines created by intelligent beings from either another dimension, another time in the future or another time/planet in the future, or (2) animals. :eek:
Animals? You think I'm joking?
Ponder this:
We know that many animals that live in low-light situations (caves and deep waters) have a natural luminescence. They give off light to attract a mate or to attract food.
Many of the UFOs seen give off unusual and frequently brilliant light.
Years ago, I read an interesting article in TRUE magazine (a man's magazine that died in 1970s but was highly regarded in its time. It would not accept fiction and everything that was printed had to be verified).
In this article, the author postulated that UFOs may be "space animals" for lack of a better term.
They travel throughout the Universe, almost as though they're grazing. The water, oxygen and abundant minerals of Earth would attract them, he believed.
Then, when they've got their fill, they move back out to Space and continue to travel. He believed that they may be highly intelligent, perhaps more intelligent than we are.
Certainly, it's food for thought whether you choose to believe or not.
Looking at these objects in this animalistic term makes a little sense. However, I will agree that those rare instances when visitors are seen in the windows of UFOs, or stepping out of them after landing, is nearly impossible to explain in animalistic terms.
Could it be that these visitors use these animals for transportation, like we use a horse?
Who knows? I'm just tossing out one theory that is no less or more valid than another.
Food for thought.
Interesting, no?