So . . . What's the solution?

[Ranger99]

Since nobody wants the police to use batons
or sprays or electrical things to subdue a
suspect that's struggling and won't comply
when trying to put the cuffs on, or
continues to struggle and put officers at
risk when trying to transport, what's an
acceptable method to gain compliance
that is to say, without grappling in the dirt
like saddie night wrasslin' ?


Letting them walk IS NOT AN OPTION

[Ranger99]

I should add that using how ever many
officers it takes to get the job done is
completely acceptable, and they have to
do it here in the prisons all the time

[Lloyd Smale]

I guess tell them there a bad boy and are going to have to sit in the corner!! ONLY a criminal or someone that is out of touch with reality is pushing this crap and the even more insane train of thought, to eliminate police all together. Gun sales will go through the roof both for good guys and bad!

[The Old Man]

It looks bad. One group claiming racial injustice, and inequality, and falling barely short of saying "We want you to be bound by the law, but we want to break those same laws with impunity."  While most seem to agree there are a percentage of LEO's who violate protocol regularly, no one has decided to clean up that faction, rather they want to eliminate the police so anarchy can reign.


Unjustified death at the hands of police can be no more tolerated than riotus looters trying to burn down a city under the guise of "protesting". Claiming those lawless rioters were not part of the protest holds even less weight than not halting the protests in the name of "peaceful protest".