Author Topic: How the World War I Maxim machine gun became a weapon of choice in Ukraine  (Read 208 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7532

https://taskandpurpose.com/news/ukraine-maxim-machine-gun-russia/

How the World War I Maxim machine gun became a weapon of choice in Ukraine


It turns out, Ukrainian forces really like the old-school Maxim machine gun. Or at least the Imperial Russian and later Soviet version of it, the PM1910.

Although the Maxim machine gun was originally created way back in the 1880s, today’s war in Ukraine has surfaced a sometimes bizarre mix of weapons and tactics. There are modern drones and troops just as likely to carry tablets as rifles. Mid-century Cold War tanks and armored personnel carriers are taking the field alongside modern rocket systems. Satellite imagery is helping troops endure old-school trench warfare. And Ukrainian fighters have been busting out machine guns that are more than 100 years old.



Take for instance this recent video of a fighter using an old Maxim, fitted with decidedly modern add-ons such as optics and a suppressor.

And if one Maxim isn’t enough, why not rig up four into one large anti-drone system? That’s what Ukrainian fighters recently did, creating a four-gun turret specifically meant to shoot down Russian drones. And even though the guns are old, it’s 2023, so the design was posted to TikTok set to a hip-hop song.

https://twitter.com/i/status/1631233163509784579

Even with Russia’s equipment troubles, it has been steadily deploying weaponized aerial drones, including the Iranian-made Shahed 131. Russia has been using drones for targeted attacks on Ukraine’s power grid, but as with much of their offensive efforts, have not been able to integrate them and other weapons systems into a full combined-arms strategy. The drones are still lethal, hence the ingenuity here from the Ukrainian soldiers.

In 2020, our friends over at The War Zone noted Ukrainian fighters liked the Maxim in part because it’s reliable. It’s bulky and needs to be water-cooled to prevent overheating, yes, but outside of that it’s accurate, the recoil isn’t too intense and it uses the standard 7.62 ammunition still widely available in post-Soviet nations. The gun was kept in production through the end of World War II, even as the Soviet Union was manufacturing newer weapons, meaning it was fairly compatible with other weapons and ammunition feeds. And as the above videos show, it’s not too difficult to put modern attachments on.

In fact, many of the modern, internet-enabled, or remote-controlled electronic weapons of war have been struggling in Ukraine. The war itself is highly anachronistic. Although not widespread, Ukrainian forces have access to jamming technology rendering many drones unreliable. Devastated landscapes have brought back trench warfare in places such as Bakhmut. The early lack of heavy armor saw fighters utilize the tried and true 20th-Century tactic of turning civilian cars into armed technicals. Given all that, it’s not entirely surprising that guns like the Maxim and the PM1910 are still popular despite their age.

As the saying goes, if it’s not broke, don’t fix it.
Like Like x 1 View List

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31576
  • Gender: Male
  "Field expediency" has developed and used common weapons in new and unique ways.

  Back when I was in the Army..and long before the McMillen TAC 50 or the Barret 50 was  developed, the Browning 50 cal "Ma Deuce" was being used as a sniper rifle.

 It called for good intel of where the enemy was expected to appear.  Say, the enemy was due at a certain p[oint 1,00 yards away, perhaps in a pass between hills.
    The Browning was set up for zero at that spot, more or less locked into place..then the wait..

  When the enemy appears..just press both thumbs.. Eureka !
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)

Online Dixie-Dude

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 991
  • Gender: Male
I've read that Russia is afraid to use its air power for fear of losing too many planes and pilots.  A massive force of air power in Iraq took out their SAMS, tanks, artillery and bunkers before we invaded.  Thus the military has fewer actual fights to take territory with low loss of life.  Russia has not employed these tactics, but are using WWII tactics without much air support and thus Ukraine is holding steady. 

This is where solar panels on rooftops of every building and home could provide a mostly uninterrupted supply of power for homes and businesses at least in the daytime.  Something to think about for Americans.  Say huge tax credits for solar with whole house battery installations.  Power out, no problem for people who have them.  Again, prices have to come down.  Then you could heat, cook, and water heat with a wood stove. 
Opelika Portal

Offline ironglow

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 31576
  • Gender: Male
 We are planning on a solar panel for our new cabin in the woods.  We already have an abundant supply of wood for heat and cooking, so why not use it?
  The solar will  be for lights, cell phones and etc....and we will still enjoy the peace and quiet of the woods.
If you don't want the truth, don't ask me.  If you want something sugar coated...go eat a donut !  (anon)