Amen Chris, but not on the $1000.00 part, that'd leave me out. However those features would make a darn fine Handgun Scope.
There is one thing I would like to point out. I started using the 2x6x32mm Bushnell Trophy Handgun Scopes back in about 1990 - 1992. It seems to me these were not the same scopes as the ones made today. The first 2x6x32mm Bushnell Trophy's I had had good fields of view (at the time they were listed at 20' at 2x if I remember correctly), but the eye relief did indeed vary from low to high magnification. I am not sure if the change came from when they switched from being manufactured in Japan ot China or what the deal is. At any rate I always liked the earlier 2x6x32mm Bushnell Trophy's I had.
I never thought the change in eye relief was a big deal, especially since at the higher powers I could never hold them steady unless I was on a stable rest, and when using a stable rest the eye relief situation didn't seem to matter nearly as much. On the other hand the last few 2x6x32mm Bushnell Trophy's I had had such small fields of view it gave me the impression of looking through a tunnel. I don't get that with the Burris Handgun Scopes I have.
As far as the clairity of each, I have had no complaints with either (or the 2x & 4x Leupold's I have had as well). In addition I have also had a single 2.5x8x28mm Weaver Handgun Scope that I also thought was a good scope.
It is a good thing they make different makes and models, that way we can all be happy, but if they made the scope you outlined we'd probably all be happier (provided we could afford it).
SD Handgunner