I'm looking for a scope (2.5-10 or 3.9X40 or thereabouts) for my newly completed mauser project. I just can't make up my mind I have been thinking about this for a long time, help put me out of my misery!!.....
Calibre is 6.5X55 so recoil should be minor and therefore eye relief less of a bother?
I plan to use the scope for general hunting but particularly dawn and dusk work. There are no constraints out here in New Zealand regarding shooting hours so low light performance is extremely important.
I have narrowed my decision to either a Nikon Monarch, Weaver Grand slam or Bushnell elite 4200
which of these scopes has the best duplex reticle?
I have been hunting recently with a friend who uses a leupold (VarXIII I think) he loses his reticle way before I do under low light conditions when I use a Zeiss conquest with etched reticle.
which is the best low light performer?
I'm guessing from what I have read that the Monarch and Weaver are similar with the 4200 outlasting them slightly.
Is the extra money ($60 or so) for the 4200 worth it?
The grand slam and Monarch have very similar pricing, does one have the edge over the other?
Thanks in advance
Lurcher
NZ