Author Topic: Lever action rimfire (Read 793 times)

verbero · « **on:** November 25, 2004, 10:01:53 AM »

Over here in Kerry supporter land (Europe) rifles aren't cheap. A new Marlin 39AS will hit you for over 700 euros, a Winchester 9422 about 600.

So, I'm afraid to say, I'm looking at the Norinco JW21 which can be had for around 200 euros.

Anyone have one, or use one? Remarks, recommendations?

I've seen a Henry lever action in a shop for just about 400 euros - would the price difference be worth it?

Bigdog57 · « **Reply #1 on:** November 25, 2004, 11:15:07 AM »

My Henry (standard H001 model) has been totally reliable, and an excellent shooter. Nice wood too. Very slick action, and easily takes a standard scope. It outshoots my Marlin 39A (a 1952 model).
IMHO, the Henry is an excellent value for the price. Customer service is superb too. Mr. Imperato, the president, has been on several gun forums, and many have talked with him via E-mail. He is determined that all customers will be satisfied, and he'll do what it takes. How many American companies nowadays will do that?
I'm expecting to soon get the Goldenboy .22 and the Bigboy, once it is available in .357 Magnum.

SBF · « **Reply #2 on:** November 26, 2004, 07:57:37 AM »

I'll second the Henry (Model H001). I bought mine about 1 1/2 years ago. I did have a problem with the sights when I first got it (since corrected). Anthony heard about my problem and contacted me via e-mail and offered to send a call tag that day and get the problem corrected. That's customer service!! The problem was minor, I corrected it myself so I didn't need to take him up on the offer but it's nice to know that they care. He even e-mailed me back a week or so later and wanted to make sure I got everything fixed up.

papajohn428 · « **Reply #3 on:** November 28, 2004, 09:43:40 AM »

My experience with the Henry was also excellent. I got mine at a reasonable price (allegedly for my son, but we know THAT was a big fat lie!) and it shoots very well. The only thing I didn't care much for was the wide, flat front sight blade. I got out a file and reshaped it to a point, to help with precision shooting. I also sent an e-mail to the Henry Company, to gripe about the front sight situation, and suggesting they try a different shape or a bead option. To my shock, the company president (Mr. Imperato) answered my e-mail the next day, and offered me several extra front sights (at no charge) to experiment with.

Being used to Marlins, I was unsure of how to tear down the rifle for cleaning, when it got a little gummy after about 5000 rounds. It turned out to be very easy to do, and in ten minutes I had it cleaned and together again, buttery-smooth once more. I like the trim forend and light weight, and the accuracy is all I can use, even without a scope. The Marlin models may be a little sturdier (and heavier) but I see no reason why anything stronger than aluminum is needed for the receiver of a 22, when the barrel is good steel. I'm not sure why, but I'm thinking of getting another one. Maybe my son will get his own rifle after all!

Papajohn

Doc T · « **Reply #4 on:** November 30, 2004, 05:35:14 AM »

I vote for the Henry, and this is from a long time Marlin fan. My daughter won a Henry lever at the DU banquet this year. Of course I had to try it and sight it in for her! I am very impressed with the rifle and do not hesitate to recommend it. With iron sights I can knock 20ga hulls off a stump at 25yds every time. Don't get me wrong, I still love my Marlin 39s but the Henry is by far the better deal now. It also lacks that ridiculous safety that the Marlins currently have.