Author Topic: 308 norma mag thoughts??  (Read 4597 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rabbithunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
308 norma mag thoughts??
« on: November 18, 2003, 10:19:44 AM »
What do you guys think of the 308 norma mag???? Opinions wanted.
Thanx

Offline Lawdog

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4464
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2003, 10:44:12 AM »
rabbithunter,

I like both of the offerings, .308 and .358, from Norma.  My brother in-law uses them with great success in Alaska.  I have many times though about building either the .358 or both of them just never got started.  The .308 is a really good .30 caliber magnum on the line of the .300 Winchester Mag., and just under the .300 Weatherby in both power and velocity.  With it's slightly longer neck than the Win. Mag. it is less finicky when it come to reloading.  I like the Norma Magnums and before I would buy a .300 Win. Mag. I would get the .308 Norma Mag. first.  Lawdog
Gary aka Lawdog is now deceased. He passed away on Jan. 12, 2006. RIP Lawdog. We miss you.

Offline 45nut

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5
308 Norma mag.
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2003, 01:40:29 PM »
I have had a 1903A3  chambered in the .308 version for a couple years now,haven't done any shooting with it yet though,too many other diversions and I like holding a rifle in reserve for when I can't afford new toys  :grin:   I have a couple hundred new norma cases for it as well as dies and have been working on the rifle off and on for a while fitting the action to a new stock as well as looking for an older 3/4" fixed power scope that will rely on the external adj. Leupold mount that I bought off ebay a long while back.   Looking to make this a "period" rifle...late fifties look.   I have heard great things about these cartridges and expect to be rewarded when I do take it to the range.   45nut
http://cast_boolits.aimoo.com/

Offline magnum308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
  • Gender: Male
Re: 308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2004, 02:22:46 AM »
Quote from: rabbithunter
What do you guys think of the 308 norma mag???? Opinions wanted.
Thanx


I'm from Australia and I have had a custom FN M98 308 Norma Mag for 25+ years. It is probably the best (most efficient) 30 cal short magnum. With genuine magnum performance (designed to be achieved in a 24" barrel). I have chronoed 180gr Hornadys at better than 3,100 fps.

 

It is truly a flat shooting, hard hitting big game calibre that it very forgotten and underrated. Though I notice that it is popping up frequently on the chatsites. Perhaps we're seeing a revival of this late great big game calibre.

Magnum308
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly rifle

Offline BS

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 147
    • http://webpages.charter.net/fam-strick/web/index.htm
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2004, 10:52:55 AM »
Varmint Caliber!
Get Close, and Whack'em Hard!

Offline magnum308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
  • Gender: Male
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2004, 11:11:26 AM »
Quote from: BS
Varmint Caliber!


No a bad thought. I certainly wore out the first barrel out in mine shooting 110 gr bulletts at close to 3,800fps. They were jolly accurate and my favourite plinking load.

Now days I don't shoot any lighter bullets than 180 gr which is really the 30 cal magnums forte.

Magnum308
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly rifle

Offline BS

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 147
    • http://webpages.charter.net/fam-strick/web/index.htm
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #6 on: November 19, 2004, 08:41:47 AM »
Norma, Win., Weatherby, H&H...........I think it is more important to find a gun that fits you well and is pleasing to look at. As far as Mags. go they are all killers. Some a little short and fatter, some long and lean. 200 fps don't mean diddly!

 Guess it depends on how you like your women! If you know what I mean! They all work, just depends upon witch one pleases you!

Do you like push feed or controlled feed? FNs or Savage?

Location of the safety, what style do you like. Can be very important if you need to use it quickly.

Life is too short to hunt with an ugly gun, but if you do, hopefully it fits and shoots straight!

BS
Get Close, and Whack'em Hard!

Offline magnum308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
  • Gender: Male
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #7 on: November 19, 2004, 10:40:39 AM »
BS,

I agree entirely and well put. However, whilst the asthetics of a rifle are important what is more important is the it fit the shooter well enough that they can use it well, when talking about .30 cal magnums. I can't improve on what the late great Jack O'Connor said many, many years ago in his great book, The Hunting Rifle....."Wicked cartridges, these .30 calibre magnums-hard hitting, hard kicking, quick killing-but only if those using them can shoot them. They are certainly just about as close to being the all-round big-game cartridges as anything...."

Magnum308
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly rifle

Offline Wilbe Lead

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 156
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #8 on: November 19, 2004, 09:40:02 PM »
Howdy Everyone,
I was in a pawnshop one day. Seen this nice Rem.700.
$250 they wanted.No Scope ,blue is a little worn on the crown.Heavy barrel.
Best tack driver I have.It turn out to be a 30/338.Loves 190 grain bullets.
Lady said no one knew what the shell was ,so there it sat.
My vote would be for 308 Norm.
Just my 2 cent
Later
Wilbe Lead

Offline Dand

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2974
308 is a good one
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2004, 11:16:50 PM »
When I set out in 1980 to have a rifle built, my heart was set for a  308 Norma.  The ONLY reason I didn't get one was the concern for ammo availability - so got the 300 win mag instead.  I'm happy with my gun but I'm sure the Norma would have been equally good. Just that I couldn't wander into any Alaskan village store for ammo if I needed it.  

Y' know, I've never had to do that with my 300 win - but its still reassuring when I drop into these villages, to see a box or 2 of 300 win on the shelf.

I still wonder why some loading manuals show the 308 Norma doing better (faster) than the Win with some of the heavier bullets - more efficient with available powders maybe?
NRA Life

liberal Justice Hugo Black said, and I quote: "There are 'absolutes' in our Bill of Rights, and they were put there on purpose by men who knew what words meant and meant their prohibitions to be 'absolutes.'" End quote. From a recent article by Wayne LaPierre NRA

Offline Judson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 241
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #10 on: December 04, 2004, 01:34:25 PM »
I am a BIG Norma mag fan and have built many of both the .308 Norma and .358 Norma mag for both my self and customers.    All shot very well and the .358 is one of the easiest cartridges I have found to load for as far as accuracy is concerned.    Does the .308 Norma beat the .300 Winchester?    Well with the heavier bullets YES, by a lot? no.
   I think my biggest reason for my fondness for the Norma is that it performs, is easy to load for accuracy, but most of all it is somthing a bit different.    As for performance the Norma falls between the .300 Winchester and the .300 Weatherby so it does not out shine what is out there.    It does however offer a true 3100+ FPS with 180 grain bullets for the .308 mag fan that wants a supper accurate cartridge that is a bit out of the ordinary.
There is no such thing as over kill!!!!  :-)

Offline JoeBru

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #11 on: December 07, 2004, 11:53:03 PM »
Another 308 Norma fan, mine is built on a commercial FN mauser action. It will put 3 ballistic tips into half inch.  
With my standard load I get ~2920 fps with 180 grain projectiles with zero case expansion, at 3000 fps I'm getting 0.0005 inch expansion, not game and no need to try for 3100 fps.  
Factory 180 grain Norma ammo is mild at 2780 fps.

Offline magnum308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
  • Gender: Male
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #12 on: January 03, 2005, 11:42:10 AM »
Anyone got some favorite (pet) loads, they'd like to share with us, for the great 308 Norma Magnum?

Mine are using ADI (Australian Defence Industry) powders that are available here in Oz. With 180 gr Hornady SPBT (stock # 3072), standard Winchester LR primers, Norma cases:

AR2213SC (sold in the US as H4831SC) 73gr @ 3,000 fps (3 shot ave). This is ADI book maximum.

AR2213SC 75grs @ 3,105 fps (3 shot ave)
AR2213SC 76grs @ 3,153 fps (3 shot ave)  
all using a CED Millennium chronograph.

The last load is "HOT" and will be used only when the hunt dictates an extra flat shooting load and in a cold climate (not the tropics). I'm happy with the 75gr load in my custom FN Mauser and this is all achieved in a genuine 24" barrel.

Of course, these loads are definitely maximum in my rifle and may be dangerous in your rifle. So always reduce stated loads by a full 10% and work up from there cautiously observing signs of pressure.

Regards,
Magnum308
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly rifle

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #13 on: January 12, 2005, 07:32:21 AM »
Several people in this thread say that the .308 Norma is more powerful, even if only slightly so, than the .300 Win Mag, based on their reading of reloading manual data.  I've never seen any reloading manual data that showed the .308 Norma as superior to the .300 Win Mag.  Apart from variances in idividual rifles, how can the .308 Norma exceed the larger .300 Win Mag with its greater powder capacity, in equal barrel lengths, bullet weights, etc?  

Please explain.

Offline Wilbe Lead

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 156
308 Norm
« Reply #14 on: January 12, 2005, 08:47:56 AM »
Hi lgm270,
The 300 win is a longer shell yes.Where the Norm starts to shine is the 200 grain bullets.
The 300 win is long ,so to get it in a magazine you have to seat the bullet deeper into the the shell giving up powder room.
The Norm is shorter ,so you can seat the 200 grain out there.
And still have room for more powder.
They both great rounds.Take that the 300 win is made more ,and easyer to get shells for off the shelve.
The 30/338 or 308 Norm was made first and was a greater round when it was born.Then Win. started making there 300 and the Norm got lost in the factory USA made guns.
I have a old 30/338 in a Model 700 Rem with a heavy target barrel.It is just for the handloader and I got it cheap because no one wanted to have to make their own shells.
When you can go to Wally World and a cheap gun ,box of shell.
Later
Wilbe Lead

Offline magnum308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
  • Gender: Male
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #15 on: January 12, 2005, 12:30:23 PM »
lgm270,

The .300 Win Mag requires a couple more grains of powder to achieve the same ballistics as the .308 Norma Mag because of the fact that the case has slightly larger capacity, i.e. more air space to fill to reach the same pressure. Accordingly, the statements that the .308 NM being the most efficient of the .30 cal magnums.

The short neck of the .300 WM makes it slightly less desirable to target shooters and handloaders (though this is not great for hunters except, as already mentioned, for the 200 gr and longer bullets). There is a builder of long range target and military (tactical) rifles here in Australia who builds .308 NM rifles for this very reason. The .308 NM has proven to be more accurate (for target and tactical shooter) than the .300 WM.

Having said that the .300 WM is a fine rifle for hunting, I have a number of friends who have it and love it. I like the .308 NM because it is a classic cartridge and, because I have handloaded since my first centrefire the unavailability (and price) of factory ammunition is not an issue.

As the .308 NM is a handloaders prospect I would be interested in hearing from other .308 NM owners/shooters sharing their pet loads.

Cheers,
Magnum308
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly rifle

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #16 on: January 14, 2005, 12:46:07 PM »
Magnum308.

Thank you for your thoughtful and informative post.  Your discussion of the shorter neck of the .300 win mag and the consequences of the longer bullets intruding down into the powder space of the shell casing is well taken.  

My view has been that a .308 Norma on a full length magnum actuion and "long throated" so that the longer bullets could be seated with the bullt's base flush with the case neck would probably equal or exceed the performace of a garden variety .300 win mag on a standard, 30-06 length action.  Of course  a "long throated" .300 Win Mag would have the same advantage over the .308 Normal.  I used to have a long throated .300 win mag and it was wonderful.   I achieved about 2950 fps with the long 200 grain Nosler partition bullet.  

I "long throated" a .338 Win mag and achieved 2800 fps with the 250 Grain Nosler Partition bullet.  This is about 100 fps less than the larger, more capacious, slightly more powerful full length .340 Weatherby Magnum.   I was going to have it re-chambered for the .340 Weatherby but instead opted for "long throating" to see how it would work out. It worked so well that I decided against rechambering.  I do not think I could endure any more  punishment in terms of recoil.  If I can't hit it or kill it with a 250 grain Partition bullet at 2,800 fps, I'm not not going to hit or kill it with that same bullet at 100 fps faster in the .340 Weatherby.

Offline magnum308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
  • Gender: Male
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #17 on: January 14, 2005, 02:43:03 PM »
Igm270,

I think we are majoring in minors here. There is little, if any, difference in practcial performance between all the std (30-06 size) .30 cal magnums. But as "factory" initiatives the .308 Norma Mag was the first (though not chambered in by US factory, it gained factory, non-wildcat, status as the factory offered cases, loading data, ammo and reamers) and ever since that the US makers have, for their own purely commercial reasons and advantage, been playing catch up. The .308 Norma ignited the post war love affair US, and therefore global, shooters commenced with the high performance belted factory magnums, that Roy Weatherby experimented with as a wildcatter in the mid 1940s. Although, according to the late, great Jack O'Connor in his excellent book "The Hunting Rifle" (Winchester Press 1970) the .30 magnum trend owed its real genesis to the 30 Newton in the US and the .300 H&H (although the latter needed a magnum mauser action and is rightly grandfather of the .30 ultra magnums) developed before WW1. But the .308 Norma Mag rightly enjoys the reputation as the grandfather of what we could call today the factory produced modern (post war) .30 cal standard belted magnums, that is a matter of history and no playing with rifle building ("long throating", et al) or loading technique can change.

The .300 Win Mag, as I have said in a previous post, a excellent cartridge in itself, owes its shape (shoulder position) to an attempt to differentiate it from the .308 NM, with which it was primarily designed to compete, not to any concept of producing higher velocity (all other things being equal) or ballistics advantage. This is borne out by the various loading tables. A quick look at the 180gar and heavier bullets loadings (the forte of the .30 cal magnums)  for both cartridges you'll see that for all prpractcialurposes they get the same performance. There may be slight differences that may be ignored and for prpractcialurposes explained as normal difference between rifles.

Now to get away from the hypotheticals. As I said in a previous post in this thread, my .308 NM (built on a standard FN M98 [non-magnum] action) albeit, at the time, an expensive classic custom hunting rifle with no long throating, but standard factory specification chamber and freebore with a 24" (not 26") Douglas premium barrel shoots 180 gar Hornady SPBT (stock# 3072) cchronographed(with a CED Millennium chronograph) at the SSAA rifle range in Brisbane, Australia at over 3,100 fps and up to 3,153 fps. These are good shooting loads too as the following target (3 shots @ 100 yards, 0.709"), shot while developing these loads, verifies. Also I have never encounter any difficulty with cartridge/magazine fit with normal seating of bullets. As you'll see from the photo of my rifle in a previous post, it is no specialized long range (long throated, 28" barreled) rig. It is just a normal hunting rifle designed to carried all day in the field.  

   

I have yet to spend serious time developing loads for the 200 gr bullets (I have a quantity of Nosler partitions ready for a Northern Territory buffalo hunt) but don't anticipate any difficulty with these.

I would venture to suggest (though I have not actually measured it) that the slightly extra powder capacity of the 300WM (produced with a case designed not to be capable of being chambered in .308 NM rather than to produce extra performance) with like bullets, and all other things being equal, would be almost entirely lost to the space required in seating bullets to fit a standard short magnum magazined hunting rifle.

Remember, the original post (the one the started this thread and the subject matter for posts) was "What do you guys think of the 308 norma mag???? Opinions wanted." There is nothing wrong, in fact several things right, with this wonderful classic cartridge that can rightly claim to be the grandfather of all modern factory standard .30 cal magnum and with which all will be compared.

Having said that, if I were wanting a factory hunting rifle today there would be nothing wrong with purchasing one of the excellent .300 Win Mags available off the shelf, it is an excellent performer. However, I choose instead to have something a little different from the crowd and since I am a fan of classic calibres a have a custom built classic .308 Norma Magnum which is a modern a rifle and calibre as one could ask for today.

Cheers,
magnum308
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly rifle

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #18 on: January 15, 2005, 09:30:58 AM »
magnum308.  What a great post. Your dedication to this wonderful classic cartridge that has served you so faithfully and of which you are so fond is comendable.  I respect your knowledge of and experience with  the .308 Norma and really enjoyed reading about it.  

Best wishes and good luck with those 200 Grain Nosler Partitions on your North Territory buffaloe hunt.

lgm270

Offline magnum308

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
  • Gender: Male
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #19 on: January 15, 2005, 04:12:46 PM »
Thanks Igm270,  I think I'm a bit of a fan of the .308 Norma, does it show? By the way does your log on name indicate you're a fan of another classic (though a bit more popular) cartridge, the .270 Win? If so I am too. I have a Winchester pre 64 Model 70 featherweight coming from the US at present in this great mountain rifle cartridge and I'll be wanting to work up some loads for it. I haven't loaded for .270 Win for about 20 years.

Rabbithunter, since you started this thread (which would be more at home under "Medium Bore Rifles" than "Big Bore rifles", perhaps the moderators can transfer it there), what is your interest in this great classic calibre? Do you have one or are you thinking of getting one?

Regards,
Magnum308
Life's too short to hunt with an ugly rifle

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
308 norma mag thoughts??
« Reply #20 on: January 17, 2005, 07:41:07 AM »
magnum308. Yes, I am a great fan of the classic .270 wcf, for which I have loaded and with which I have hunted for many years.  I've used the 130 grain & 150 grain Nosler partitions on mule deer, wild boar and antelope with great sucess, mostly with H4831 and now Reloader 22 powder.  I hope you enjoy this great old classic as much as I have. I'm sure it will serve your needs as satisfactorily as it has mine.

Offline tuck2

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 277
308 Norma Mag
« Reply #21 on: February 06, 2005, 06:40:06 PM »
I used 72.0 Gr. of H 4831  and 76.0 Gr of N 205 with a Hornady 165 Gr. Hornady SP in my Parked Hale 308 Norma Mag.rifle for hunting -shooting mule deer, pronghorn, and elk . I ran 300 H&H case into a 308 Norma case trin die and then fire formed the cases when I first reloaded the round. I still have 1 1/2 Lbs. of N205 powder and 100 ea new brass that I purchased in the mid 60,s .  This is a good old round that I may use on elk this fall with a 180 Gr. bullet . The round was used to win a 1000 Yd. bench rest shoot with 60 shots aggregate of 11.3 inches back in 1970 per an old Sierra reloading manual.