Author Topic: Is the cold war really over?  (Read 870 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Leverdude

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 601
Is the cold war really over?
« on: February 17, 2005, 12:29:47 PM »
Iran-Russia Deal Could Blunt Bush Diplomacy Talk

40 minutes ago   World - Reuters
 

By Adam Entous

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) said on Thursday there was still time for diplomacy to halt Iran's nuclear ambitions, but a Russian deal to provide the Islamic republic with nuclear fuel in defiance of the United States was likely to rekindle fears of confrontation.
 

Iran accused its long-time foe Washington of using a brief worldwide scare over an explosion on Wednesday near its only nuclear reactor to unleash "psychological warfare."


The explosion -- first reported by Iranian television as a possible airplane missile strike but later said to have been an errant construction site blast -- rattled an anxious world.


Washington has accused Iran of trying to develop nuclear weapons, and it is seeking to halt any potential weapons-related work.


Iran, rich in oil but struggling to provide power for a growing population, denies that it is developing nuclear arms and says its program is solely for generating electricity.


"As you know, the Iranian issue hasn't even gotten to the (U.N.) Security Council yet. And so there's more diplomacy, in my judgment, to be done," Bush told a news conference called to present his new U.S. intelligence czar.


Bush's remarks suggested that any moves toward military action would wait at least until after the matter goes before the United Nations (news - web sites) for possible sanctions.


Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites) recently raised the possibility that Israel, Washington's close ally, might take matters into its own hands and bomb suspected Iranian nuclear sites.


Bush in 2002 grouped Iran with North Korea (news - web sites) and Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s Iraq (news - web sites) into what he called an "axis of evil."


But he told the news conference that Iran was different from Iraq, which the United States invaded over allegations of weapons development but only after years of diplomacy. Bush said he would discuss Iran during a trip to Europe next week.


Later, his national security adviser, Stephen Hadley, called on Iran to stop supporting Hizbollah guerrillas, warning the group's activities could threaten a fragile cease-fire deal between Israeli and the Palestinians.


REACTOR FUEL DEAL WITH RUSSIA


Iran, meanwhile, announced a deal to be signed later this month to obtain nuclear fuel from Russia, Washington's former superpower rival, for the reactor in the southern Iranian city of Bushehr.


Russian Atomic Energy Agency chief Alexander Rumyantsev said ways of accelerating the reactor's start-up would be discussed during his visit to Tehran next week, Russia's Interfax news agency reported.


The 1,000-megawatt reactor is due to reach full capacity in 2006.


Under the deal, spent fuel would be sent back to Siberian storage units after about a decade of use -- a condition Russia thinks should allay U.S. concerns that Iran could use the material to make weapons.


Word of the Russian agreement came one day after Iranian state television shook world markets -- already worried about any possible U.S. or Israeli intervention -- by reporting an explosion near the Russian-built nuclear power plant.

   



The explosion was later attributed to work during dam construction, but only after reports of the blast were flashed around the world.

Iran's chief nuclear negotiator, Hassan Rohani, saw a calculated campaign by the United States and the Western media. "Reports of a strike were false and are psychological warfare," against Iran's legitimate nuclear program, he said.

Tehran has accused the United States of using satellites and other means to spy on its nuclear sites and threatened to shoot down any surveillance craft.

The European Union (news - web sites), represented by France, Britain and Germany, has been trying to persuade Iran to scrap any weapons-related activities in return for economic incentives.

Hadley, speaking to reporters hours after the news conference, played down differences with Europe, and put the onus on Iran to show it was prepared to accept a permanent cessation of its enrichment programs and reprocessing activities. "I think that's really the next thing that we need to see," he said.

But the Islamic republic has repeatedly said it will never permanently end its nuclear activities -- a policy that enjoys widespread support across a broad range of domestic political, social and religious factions.

Israel said on Wednesday that Iran was just six months away from having the knowledge to build nuclear weapons.

In the past, Israel has warned of possible pre-emptive military attacks on its nuclear facilities, similar the attack on Iraq's Osiraq reactor in 1981.

Bush did not repeat his vice president's suggestion of possible Israeli air strikes, but he used his press conference to reiterate strong backing for the Jewish state.

"Iran has made it clear they don't like Israel, to put it bluntly. And the Israelis are concerned whether or not Iran develops a nuclear weapon, as are we, as should everybody," Bush said.

"In that Israel is our ally, and in that we've made a very strong commitment to support Israel, we will support Israel if their security is threatened," Bush said.
Freedoms not free!
Support your NRA!

Offline Shorty

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1098
Is the cold war really over?
« Reply #1 on: February 17, 2005, 01:56:43 PM »
If Israel feels threatened, it will act, regardless of what ANYBODY else thinks.  They proved that against Iraqs nuke program.  The UN can talk until doomsday, the US can bluster, but Israel is under the gun.

Offline Nightrain52

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 814
Is the cold war really over?
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2005, 02:48:23 PM »
I am still totally convinced if we would have supplied Israel what they needed back in tha 70s We wouldn't be in Iraq now. Israel would have opened a big can of whoop-a** and cleaned up the area over there. They live by the eye for an eye policy, something that we should have done a long time ago. :shock:
FREEDOM IS WORTH FIGHTING FOR-ARE YOU WILLING TO DIE FOR IT--------IT'S HARD TO SOAR LIKE AN EAGLE WHEN YOU ARE SURROUNDED BY TURKEYS

Offline Leverdude

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 601
Is the cold war really over?
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2005, 02:56:39 PM »
Quote from: Nightrain52
I am still totally convinced if we would have supplied Israel what they needed back in tha 70s We wouldn't be in Iraq now. Israel would have opened a big can of whoop-a** and cleaned up the area over there. They live by the eye for an eye policy, something that we should have done a long time ago. :shock:





Yup.  :grin:
Freedoms not free!
Support your NRA!

Offline fe352v8

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 700
  • Gender: Male
  • Evolve or become extinct
Is the cold war really over?
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2005, 04:12:08 PM »
What have we withheld from them? They have consitently been one of the largest recipients of US aid for a number of years.  In return we have gotten a stalwart ally, cut diamonds, panty hose,  a chance for the rebuilding of the temple, for those of a biblical bent, and the arab extremists have gotten an excuse.

By the way I do not think we should abandon them, as they are the only country in that part of the world that aside from being members of the same species, we have much in common with.  But we should not carte blanc approve their every action.

life is no joke but funny things happen

jon
life is no joke but funny things happen

jon