Out of the many rifles I have owned I find that the following military bolt actions have been exceptional in the accuracy dept...Lee Enfield number 4 (1948 vintage), Swedish Mauser 96, both of my wartime made Mosin nagant 91/30's, all my Japanese arisakas, my Yugo Mauser 48, and 2 other Mausers with corrosion damaged bores. These guns were used with open sights, and factory ammo.:grin:
I have purchased two new sporters over the years, a Remington 700 in .243 and my CZ 550 in 30-06. These two guns were new and broken in properly, I have used hand loads and factory ammo. Yet they can't hold a candle compared to the surplus guns mentioned before. Ok, the Mosins and the Enfield have floating barrels, which helps, but the Mausers have tight stock band contact with the barrel, and they shoot soooo good. I regret selling the Remington as it was an ADL before the quality went sour and now I realize that was how those sporters shoot, mediocre, could have used it for woodchucks at 75 yards with a scope. My CZ in 30-06 with a 3 X 9 scope is at least trying, and I stand a chance of getting a better handload result, yet it cannot presently match my Mosins.
My small bores all shoot good and it seems that once you get into the 6 mm and larger the sporters seem to require lots of fancy work, bedding, custom barrels, etc. to get them to shoot well. Lets see...fancy sporter, many hundreds of dollars to buy, gunsmithing work, maybe it will be a tack driver? Cheap beat up surplus gun, tired barrel, open sights, no gunsmithing...tack driver as is. You don't always get what you pay for.
Anyone else notice this too?
Thanks.