Author Topic: 10x scopes and adjustable objectives (Read 354 times)

thelaw · « **on:** April 12, 2005, 05:55:50 AM »

i've narrowed my scope choice down to 2 nikons, the 3.3-10,44mm and the 3.5-10, 50mm. the 44mm has the AO and the 50mm does not. why? which one would you get?

Redhawk1 · « **Reply #1 on:** April 12, 2005, 08:53:26 AM »

Neither, I would get a Leuplod. :-D

What are you putting it on? I would have to know what gun you intended to use, before I could decide on a scope. :-)

coyote 2 · « **Reply #2 on:** April 13, 2005, 10:12:45 AM »

Quote

the 44mm has the AO and the 50mm does not. why? which one would you get?

If you are planning on any close shooting at all. Go with the AO - the 50mm may be brighter - but brightness does no good at all if the picture is blurry.......... :eek: ...............

or you could buy the Leupold :wink: but with what you pay for it - you could probably purchase both of the Nikon's -

jeff223 · « **Reply #3 on:** April 13, 2005, 02:59:39 PM »

i would go with the 44mm Nikon if it were me.i dont think a person need a 50mm bell.i feel the Nikon scopes have a much clearer lens compaired to Leupold scopes.nothing wrong with a Leupold but i feel they are over priced.i had a 3-9 vari x II and a 4x Leupold pistol scope and i sold both of them.i made a few bucks on them but i bought them right.the 3-9 vari x II was a good scope but the 4x pistol scope was a joke.Leupold needs to rework their pistol scope lineup.Burris puts them to shame on that lineup.

Nikons are very hard to beat