Author Topic: Ruger #1 405Win.  (Read 878 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RockChucker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 8
Ruger #1 405Win.
« on: April 24, 2005, 06:51:09 AM »
I'm looking at buying a #1 in 405Win. any comments good or otherwise would be appreciated regarding the combination of a Ruger#1 chambered in 405Win.
Thanks to those who take the time to respond !

Offline Uncle Ji

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 170
  • Gender: Male
  • ILLEGITIMUS NON CARBORUNDUM EST
    • Hawaiian Style
Ruger #1 405Win.
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2005, 09:52:15 PM »
Here's an informative article by Jeff Quinn of Gun Blast that should answer mosts questions you have about this rifle/ammo combination. http://www.gunblast.com/Ruger_No1_405.htm

Offline gcf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73
Ruger #1 405Win.
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2005, 03:33:21 AM »
Can't imagine that you would not be happy with it - as long as you reload. I think that the right load in this rifle, would give you sub-moa.

Might want to check out Cast Performance Bullets.
Regards - GCF
"Sometimes you make eight - sometimes you hit dirt!"

Offline slayer

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 937
Ruger #1 405Win.
« Reply #3 on: May 03, 2005, 02:21:32 PM »
The Ruger No. 1 is a sweet looking rifle, except the cut in the forearm near the end of it. Has it always had that? Jack.

Offline simbo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 4
405 Win. in Ruger #1
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2005, 03:57:30 AM »
I own one and love it. Accuracy is excellent. The Barnes 300 grain X backed by 53 gr. Reloader 15  produces sub-inch accuracy. Velocity is right at 2250 fps. More than enough to down anything in NA. I modified the forearm on my rifle (The Ross Seyfried fix) before I shot it. However, I would think with the heavy barrel in this caliber, nothing needs to be done to the forearm. Try it first.  

The triggers on these guns are OK. A little heavy but mine has no creep. I have no problem with it. A different  hammer spring is available from Brownells, which may help lower trigger pull.

I also bought a NECG peep sight. I can hold 1 1/2 groups with this load at 100 yards.

Its a fun gun and I plan to take it Elk hunting this fall.

Simbo

Offline gcf

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 73
Ruger #1 405Win.
« Reply #5 on: May 15, 2005, 06:50:49 AM »
Quote from: slayer
The Ruger No. 1 is a sweet looking rifle, except the cut in the forearm near the end of it. Has it always had that? Jack.


The light & medium Sporters, as well as (apparently) the Tropical models all have the A. Henry fore arm w/ the "cut".

The gent that I bought my #1S (45-70) from told me the term for that feature, but I can't quite remember. Senior moment.

The purpose for it is un-clear, but I've always felt that it was originally (waaaay back) designed for "shooting sticks" / aka portable bipod.

Maybe someone else can provide a little extra info.

What ever your feelings about the appearance of the fore arm, I can only recommend that you buy the rifle. The "cut" will grow on you.......
Regards - GCF
"Sometimes you make eight - sometimes you hit dirt!"

Offline captainkirk

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 112
#1 Forearm
« Reply #6 on: May 15, 2005, 09:50:00 AM »
I believe you can also "change out" the Alexander Henry forearm (with the cut) for the other one (larger -without the cut) at your own expense.  I remember seeing an article a while back, I think it was John Sundra -who had done just that.  He like the other one better.  The barrel band was still in place and the stud for the sling protruded through a hole provided for it.  This was on a .375H&H model if memory serves, that had been rechambered to 375 JRS (akin to 375 WBY I think).

I am with gcf though.  My 458 has the A. Henry forearm and I love it, just give it some time.

captainkirk
Phil 4:13   I can do all things through Christ who strengtheneth me.