Mac
What I meant was it would be nice if we did NOT have to have the factory "fit" our barrels, in order to get a new one. I do hope this pressures NEF to give us barrels that do not need fitting. I still do not want to part with my receiver.
My thoughts on the $180 was total. Should have been clearer I guess. By the time one spends $130 for a barrel, say, 15 for shipping, that's at $145, not far away. Plus for now anyway, NEF has way more calibers. But I'm sure they're (CVA) testing the waters.
Besides, TC barrels are at least $200 and customs go way up from there. I have held TC's and except for the strength, I do not see the difference in money. My opinion only. The lock up might be stronger but didn't feel that way to me. The trigger was no better than my 223 UV, in fact it was not as good. Mine came from the factory that way.
I have handled the Mossbergs and came close to buying one. Trigger was very nice, lock-up solid, seemed more so than the TC, but just like the TC I do not like the lever-under-the-triggerguard idea. Too inconvient to reload.
looks to me like the Optima opens the same way. No thanks. Besides I cannot see it being any more accurate than the NEF's that I have. My 223 shoots dime size groups and the 243 is every bit as promissing.
To each his own. They may well be fine rifles but not for me.
Never handled a CVA rifle or ML for that matter. So my comparison was going by online looks only.