Author Topic: short range hunting?  (Read 783 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sjones

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 72
  • Gender: Male
short range hunting?
« on: September 22, 2005, 12:22:42 PM »
If I don't reload,which would be the best for under 100 yard deer hunting?44mag or 45 LC? thanks. sj :? I already have a 336, 30-30.just love lever actions.

Offline azmike

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 244
  • Gender: Male
short range hunting?
« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2005, 12:31:38 PM »
IMO 44 mag.  I hear the heavy loads in 45 LC from Cor-Bon et al can get pricey.

Offline bill m.

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 17
short range hunting?
« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2005, 09:56:56 PM »
Put them both on a rack, close your eyes and turn around 3 times, walk up and see which one you grab first. Both would be great. Under 100 yards, you wouldn't need expensive maximum loads. Don't use hollow points. Get penetration with hardcast or a softpoint.

Offline old geezer

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 140
short range hunting?
« Reply #3 on: September 23, 2005, 12:07:35 AM »
Why not consider a .357?  It'd do as good, and a lot cheaper to shoot.

Offline tanoose

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 839
  • Gender: Male
short range hunting?
« Reply #4 on: September 23, 2005, 09:50:26 AM »
I reccommend the 44 mag you can get them anywhere and you can get some cheap practice loads . You can get very heavy but not needed loads from  cor-bon grizzly and buffalo bore.  The federal 300 cast hunting load would be great for deer and blackbear to 100 yards

Offline Slamfire

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1028
short range hunting?
« Reply #5 on: September 23, 2005, 07:00:05 PM »
Quote from: old geezer
Why not consider a .357?  It'd do as good, and a lot cheaper to shoot.


In a rifle, wouldn't a .357 Maximum be better? :D
Bold talk from a one eyed fat man.