Has anyone tried using pyrodex pellets in a caplock muzzleloader? I bought a caplock and the book said that because it is a caplock, pyrodex pellets may not consistently ignite. Anyone have problems with pellets?
Thanks.
I've tried them in TC Hawken caplocks, and the results are as advertised...poor and unreliable.
The reason is that BP substitutes have a much higher ignition temperature than real BP, and when using pellets, there's no loose powder to "bump" over into the nipple fire channel.
Without a few loose kernels of powder in the nipple fire channel to jump start some fire to the main charge, the nipple flame by itself usually can't reach/ignite a pellet physically way over in the barrel.
This is particularly made worse if using pellets in a rifle such as a TC that has a patent breech plug design...because in that case, the pellet is not only sitting over to the left of the nipple, it is also sitting higher up above the nipple fire channel...so flame really has to go through some contortions to even reach a pellet, and a #11 primer is just not a flame thrower so to speak.
And even in inlines, when pellets first came out they weren't 100% reliable, so a special "ignitor ring" was added to the manufacturing process which is the dark black band you'll see painted on one end of a Pyrodex pellet...it ignites easier than the pellet itself, then it aids in igniting the pellet's powder.
The only way to reliably use pellets in regular sidelocks is to use a small amount of loose powder down bore first, then seat the pellets down on that, however, while that actually works, I found it to be more trouble than it's worth.
PS:
TC has introduced the "Firestorm" model which has a redesigned breech plug so that pellets can be used in it...a percussion and a flintlock version.