Thanks for the responses, Gentlemen......
I thought about this and weighed the pros and cons of the 32 vs 380. and Kel-tec vs NAA. There were other tiny pistols in the running, too.
The 380 is the better cartridge for the job, but the size and weight issues made me get the 32acp.
I thought about the Kel-tec, and the weight of it was very appealing, but have heard of its plastic trigger breaking. The difference in cost between the Kel-tec and NAA 32acp was about $200 vs $300.....not enough to consider it on price alone.
The weight difference between the Kel-tec and NAA32 is about 7oz. Kel-tec is 6.6oz, and NAA32 is 13.5oz. Although that sounds like a substantial difference, the 7oz difference isn't a whole lot to consider.
The Rohrbaugh 9mm was too expensive.
The Seecamp 380 was too expensive.
Beretta Tomcat was too big.
Kahr PM9 was too big.
Walther PPKS was too big.
Seecamp 32acp has a magazine safety. (I already have an older Seecamp in 25acp.) It's a fine little pistol, but that magazine safety and cost were factors in my not getting another one.
NAA mini mag revolver is difficult to hold and there are less carry options for it. Also, I've heard of pocket lint jamming this little revolver. ( I purchased one of these in 22mag, even so, and a holster that ought to solve the problems of how to carry and pocket lint.)
hog
