"The reality is that you can have habitat that is over run with deer due to an unbalanced buck/doe ratio & an immature age structure of bucks who don't survive past 1 1/2 years, or you can embrace QDM principles w/ antler point restrictions & liberal doe harvest allotments that seek to balance the herd with quality animals. The hard fact is that you can't have it both ways!" No you can't have it both ways, but how long can the liberal doe harvest last? Certainly can't for too long, since deer numbers are already lower. Then what? The state will probably not give doe permits in many areas which will lead to fewer hunters being allowed to take a doe, while at the same time being restricted to shooting bucks that have 3 or 4 points to a side. End result will be lower success rates, and more hunters losing interest in deer hunting altogether. Maybe that's what the whole plan is about. To have the state become a trophy state where the common man is run off so that the elite can lease it all out and throw the big money around? Remember, many hunters hunt for the enjoyment and the meat deer hunting can provide. Big antlers have very little to do with this. The states responsibilty is to manage the deer herd, and NOT to manage it for trophy hunters!