Author Topic: "Unintended Consequences" by John Ross  (Read 519 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline RaySendero

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
  • Gender: Male
"Unintended Consequences" by John Ross
« on: November 29, 2005, 01:16:42 PM »
FW,

Will you tell us something about the book you mentioned in another post?
    Ray

Offline FWiedner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
"Unintended Consequences" by John
« Reply #1 on: November 29, 2005, 02:24:34 PM »
Unintended Consequences is a novel by author John Ross, published by Accurate Press. The story chronicles the history of the gun culture, gun rights and gun control in the United States from the early 1900s through the late 1990s. Although it is a work of fiction, the story is heavily laced with accurate historical information, including real-life figures who play minor supporting roles. The novel also features unusually detailed and intricate facts, figures and explanations of many firearms-related topics.

The story hinges upon the enactment and subsequent unintended consequences of several important pieces of U.S. gun control legislation: the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Gun Control Act of 1968, the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986, and the Assault Weapons Ban of 1994. The Assault Weapons Importation Ban enacted by Presidential Executive Order in 1989 also figures prominently in the story.

Its thesis is that enough bullying by what, rightly or wrongly, is widely perceived as a hostile outside occupation government will inevitably end in revolt if the area involved is large enough and has a separate enough culture, and that this revolt will be undefeatable if the rebels use very-low-tech "leaderless resistance."

There is enough actual history to make the book informative, enough technical detail to let one know that the author actually knows a thing or two about guns, and enough of a story-line to make the book entertaining.  

The missive line that most readers carry away that identifies them as a wink and nod fan is "It's time to feed the hogs."

If you've ever wondered whether or not you could get fired up over the incremental erosion of Americans rights under the 2nd Amendment, read the book and then try tell me that you still think that you can sit on the fence.

It provokes enough honest thought to earn it's solid position as a cult favorite.

 :D
They may talk of a "New Order" in the  world, but what they have in mind is only a revival of the oldest and worst tyranny.   No liberty, no religion, no hope.   It is an unholy alliance of power and pelf to dominate and to enslave the human race.

Offline RaySendero

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1064
  • Gender: Male
"Unintended Consequences" by John
« Reply #2 on: December 01, 2005, 02:12:24 PM »
Thx
    Ray

Offline arky65

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 148
  • Gender: Male
"Unintended Consequences" by John
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2005, 01:20:52 PM »
I have read this book, it is a great read. I encourage anyone that has any doubts as to what the government, maligned bureaucrats and politicians, can, could and have done with existing law to subjugate our civil rights to read this book and pass it on along to others.

arky65

Offline BrianMcCandliss

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 157
"Unintended Consequences" by John
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2005, 10:17:26 PM »
Quote from: FWiedner
Unintended Consequences
Its thesis is that enough bullying by what, rightly or wrongly, is widely perceived as a hostile outside occupation government will inevitably end in revolt if the area involved is large enough and has a separate enough culture, and that this revolt will be undefeatable if the rebels use very-low-tech "leaderless resistance."

...
If you've ever wondered whether or not you could get fired up over the incremental erosion of Americans rights under the 2nd Amendment, read the book and then try tell me that you still think that you can sit on the fence.

 :D


I don't think the 2nd Amendment is enough in itself, since most citizens accept that the states are NOT free, but rather are legally subject to federal majority-dictates; they've been forced to repeat daily since childhood, that the USA is "one nation, indivisible, with libery and justice for all." So why would they care about some rootin' tootin' gun-slingers, yahoos and rednecks- or other culturally stereotypical charicatures of gun-owners?

I'd say that the DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE needs to be revived-- along with the other documents, such as the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution-- specifically, that the United States is neither 1) one nation, 2) under God (since it's not a theocracy), nor 3) indivisible; likewise, "libery and justice" are individual responsibilities which governments are instituted to secure-- and are subject to alteration and abolition of they fail in this regard, not to be "pledged allegiance" to irregardless!

I'll say it here: the United States is a false empire, being perverted from a free republic of sovereign states which were conquered by force, treason and treachery.
Once people start realizing this, THEN we can take back our freedom-- starting by having as few as ONE state simply challenging the federal Union to VERIFY its claim of national authority over that state.

The Union won't be able to do it- -and the state will be sovereign-- along with all the OTHER states.

That's ALL it will take!
For this reason, I urge people everywhere to start freedom-movements in their respective states, by both referendum-petition and by legal process.