Author Topic: Gun and Caliber Choice? ? ? ? ? (Read 661 times)

bayrunner · « **on:** January 31, 2006, 09:07:49 PM »

Hey Guys____ Just curios, what caliber in a derringer (small) type of firearm, would you think would be most effective. Taking in consideration,effectiveness, controllability and recoil, self defense two legged critters_____ THANKS BAYRUNNER

Redhawk1 · « **Reply #1 on:** February 01, 2006, 01:31:16 AM »

I like them 45 /410 derringers. But what I carry that is real small is the NAA 22 MAG.

stimpylu32 · « **Reply #2 on:** February 01, 2006, 02:22:01 AM »

If you must go that small i'd look at the Davis 9mm derringers ,sense feeding is not a problem use the Glazzer Safety Slugs .

Recoil will be controlable and your shots will be at or near point plank range . I think that a small 5 shot .38 spl. would be a better choice and not much bigger .

Questor · « **Reply #3 on:** February 01, 2006, 02:30:24 AM »

None. Derringers are hard to shoot and clumsy to carry, and awkward to handle and "deploy". Get something else, like a small auto.

WNY_Whitetailer · « **Reply #4 on:** February 01, 2006, 06:52:37 AM »

I would not opt for a derringer type gun...I would look into the smaller guns from NAA and Kel-Tec for their small size and ability to carry more than a couple rounds...I'm sure that there are other small guns that people will add but those are the two that I could think of right now.

PA-Joe · « **Reply #5 on:** February 01, 2006, 07:04:22 AM »

Get a Kel Tech 32 NAA or 380.

bayrunner · « **Reply #6 on:** February 01, 2006, 12:47:25 PM »

____ Thanks for the replys. I guess if I go derringer I'll probably go 45/410 , or a "SMALL" 5 or 6 shooter ,S&W or something.____ THANKS BAYRUNNER

jro45 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 02, 2006, 02:19:58 AM »

Whats wrong with the 357 snub nose?

Reed1911 · « **Reply #8 on:** February 02, 2006, 05:34:12 AM »

Now wait a minute, Derringers are no harder to control or deploy than anything else. All it takes is practice. Now, cheap guns are cheap and nothing more needs to be said. A good quality derringer with practice is eaiser to conceal (caliber vs. caliber) than a semi auto or revolver and weighs less. The .45/.410's that I have shot take a LOT of practice to become proficent and they do hurt a bit from recoil. I carry a small back-up 9mm that I keep loaded with 90g XTP's. The recoil is not great, accuracy is point and shoot good. Care for a challenge? Grab a derringer and try to shoot a 10yds holding a group. Move to the 5yd line (where you would most likely deploy it) and you get a great sense of satisfaction.

Dusty Miller · « **Reply #9 on:** February 02, 2006, 07:28:00 AM »

A derringer is an absolute last option self-defense item and ranks only slightly ahead of swift feet. A five shot 357 snubby such as the Ruger (SP 101?) would serve you a lot better but its your tush, protect it as you will.

Redhawk1 · « **Reply #10 on:** February 02, 2006, 08:31:55 AM »

Quote from: Dusty Miller

A derringer is an absolute last option self-defense item and ranks only slightly ahead of swift feet. A five shot 357 snubby such as the Ruger (SP 101?) would serve you a lot better but its your tush, protect it as you will.

I would take a derringer over running any time. I guess some of us have better confidence in our shooting ability that others. :-D

papajohn428 · « **Reply #11 on:** February 05, 2006, 12:04:33 PM »

For about the same size as a Derringer, I'd go for the Kel-Tec P3AT. The price is right, the bugs are long-since worked out, and it's controllable. And about half the size of a snubby. I don't own one, but I plan on getting one! But if you opt for the Derringer, the advice about using Glaser Safety Slugs is worth heeding. A lot of the cops I used to work with carried little Beretta 25's with Glasers, and at bellygun range, they will do a number on a bad guy!

Papajohn