Author Topic: vx-II vs. monarch ucc  (Read 716 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thelaw

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 220
vx-II vs. monarch ucc
« on: January 25, 2006, 05:22:48 AM »
while i own 2 monarchs, which i like very much, i'm considering trying a leupold on my .300wsm. never owned one before. just wanting see how the 2 models compare to each other. the scopes i'm considering are the nikon monarrch ucc 5.5-16.5, 44mm & the leupold vx-II 4.5-14, 40mmAO.

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
vx-II vs. monarch ucc
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2006, 06:23:08 AM »
Both are excellent scopes.  The Monarch is a better value, though.  It costs less and has better optics.

You should know that the Leupold VX-II, however, has longer eye relief, which could be worth spending the extra money given that you want to mount it on a .300WSM.

Zachary

Offline whitedogone

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
vx-II vs. monarch ucc
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2006, 03:34:44 PM »
Why would you want so much power and such a large scope on a .300 rifle?  IF you have to go with such high power, the lupey would be a better choice.  The Leupolds are smaller and lighter across the board.  WDO
Beretta S686 Sporting 12g 30"
Beretta Silver Pigeon Sporting 20g 28"
Ithaca (SKB) Model 500 Skeet 28g 28"
Browning BPS Syn. 12g 3.5" 26"
Browning BPS rifled w/ Pentax 2x5x20
Tikka M595 in .223 w/ Bushnell Elite 4200 4-16x40
Savage 93 in 17HMR w/ Mueller APV 4.5-14
Winchester 94 mint Built in 1951
Ruger Redhawk 7 1/2" 44 Mag

http://www.illinoiscarry.com/

Offline 32 Point Buck

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
vx-II vs. monarch ucc
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2006, 05:59:51 PM »
Although I have no experience with the VXII in the field. I have been trying to determine the difference between the VXIII, Monarch, and Conquest. It seems Zeiss has the best optics. However Nikon is very close and a less expensive. The Leupold VX series seems to have more of a yellowish tint and not quite as crisp aroung the edges in my opinion. If your willing to spend the $$$$. Swarovski AV series would be my choice.

Offline moontroll

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 102
vx-II vs. monarch ucc
« Reply #4 on: January 28, 2006, 07:49:43 AM »
I have a Leupold vx 11 and 111,Monarch and a Zeiss Conquest.The Leupold VX11 isnt in the same class with the conquest or monarch,but is a very good scope.if you add the VX111 to the line up I would chose the VX 111. Overall its the best scope I'v seen,The conquest would be the second(very close) choice.The Leupold VX111 has it all,quick to picture.repeatability,eye relief,general view,and good light transmission.The Zeiss has better glass,but the leupold is quicker on target.The VX 11 is a good scope and wont let you down.

Offline moontroll

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 102
vx-II vs. monarch ucc
« Reply #5 on: January 28, 2006, 07:53:18 AM »
I forgot to mention the best ones,The Bushnell elites.

Offline whitedogone

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 295
vx-II vs. monarch ucc
« Reply #6 on: January 28, 2006, 11:51:29 AM »
Ditto the Elite's

Beretta S686 Sporting 12g 30"
Beretta Silver Pigeon Sporting 20g 28"
Ithaca (SKB) Model 500 Skeet 28g 28"
Browning BPS Syn. 12g 3.5" 26"
Browning BPS rifled w/ Pentax 2x5x20
Tikka M595 in .223 w/ Bushnell Elite 4200 4-16x40
Savage 93 in 17HMR w/ Mueller APV 4.5-14
Winchester 94 mint Built in 1951
Ruger Redhawk 7 1/2" 44 Mag

http://www.illinoiscarry.com/