From Squatchdetective.com on The Bullet Maker Threads

[Graybeard]

Here is an announcement posted today at Squatchdetective.com regarding the Bullet Maker Threads posted there. This is the site he gave "exclusive use" of his photo. Here is the announcment there:

Topic: "The Bullet Maker Threads" (Read 20 times)
The Squatchdetective
Administrator

member is online




"The truth IS out there!!!"

 
   

Joined: Dec 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 160
Location: New York
  "The Bullet Maker Threads"
« Thread Started on Today at 5:38pm »  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A word to the forum members:

We have removed the "Bullet Maker Threads"

We have several reasons however, we want everyone to know the first and foremost reason.

There is no dispute that Bullet Maker, to many is a controversial person in the Bigfoot world .

Squatchdetective.com took the topic head on, because it is our Mission Statement to take the "BS out of BF".

Unfortunately we were unable to keep the feud out of this forum.

The new people who did not belong to the forum previous to the Bullet Maker threads, when the preliminary report is issued, will obviously see that we here at Squatchdetective.com are straight shooters.

So our decision to pull the threads, and move us back to "on topic " discussions was needed.

Needless to say there are other just as controversial issues out there to evaluate.

The Squatchdetective will compile a full report and will be posted on the forum by Monday morning as to the Bullet Maker evidence.

As you know Fireman has spent a few days in the bush at the Bullet Maker's Property. I will be recieving his evidence later this week for evaluation.

I find it very unfortunate that some of our staff were caught in the middle of these personality conflicts.

There will be a follow up to this statement as well on Monday.

Thanks for all your support gang.

The Squatchdetective
 

[powderman]

Where is BM??? Haven't seen him for a couple of days. POWDERMAN.  :?  :?  :?  :?  :?  :?

[Graybeard]

He is mad at me, doesn't think he is being given fair treatment here. He is still reading but apparently not posting right now. But after Monday he will be mad at the folks over at Squatchdetective more than at me so he might come back then.

I offered the quote from there without comment just for information since this site has been his home site for so long. What will be revealed I do not know. I'm getting indications tho it will not be to his liking. More I just don't know. That site had exclusive permission to post his "enhanced" image and now have not only removed it but have removed all the posts relating to it.

[Telahnay's g'son]

http://squatchdetective.com/reports/2chiggers_Report.pdf

[kyote]

Hmmm..this whole thing sems to have gone south in a hand basket pretty fast.
I would love to go to BM's area when I retire  and check out what is going on.I am no expert.but sounds like something just great to do..

[Skeeterbaymac]

Based on the link Telahnay's g son just posted I guess I think that they just verified what BM has been saying on this site all along.  What I got out of that link is the following: BM was genuine "we do not feel this is a hoax". There is some activity on his farm and apparently he has a better picture of this thing than we have seen.  All these things are things that BM said many many times on this site.

 I do not know BM I have never had a conversation with BM I do not even know his real name.  So I have no axe to grind here either way.  Heck I am one of the guys that still doesn't know if he believes in BF.   I have had no encounters of anything that I could not explain.  But  BM knows something is on his farm and something is dragging full grown steers and whitetail around.  It's hard to dispute missing or dead cattle and deer hanging in tree's :?   I don't know if it's big foot, mt lion or something else but I do think BM honestly believes it's BF and I ain't prepared to argue with him at this point. If my steers were dead or hanging in trees, you would be hard pressed to convince me something out of the ordinary wasn't going on too!

[Greybeard]

I was quite surprised by that report. First up because it came as a partial now when the had said the full report would be posted on Monday. Second because it's a 180 flip-flop from the indications on the site and from other private intell I had gotten on what the report "might" contain.

We have others here who are still posting who are former friends of Doug's that will testify that there are bigfoot critters in that area. They merely differ on what the specific photo shows.

Me I dunno. I'm still a skeptic on the exisitence of such a critter and guess I will be until I see one personally or a bunch of hard tangible evidence is presented to scientist who then acknowledge it as a new species not yet identified.

I'm not aware of anyone who has ever said the photo might be a hoax, we only disagree on what it shows or what we can see in it versus what Doug thinks he sees in it. That is really the difference as to opinions of the photo.

There are other matters tho that supposedly had been proven to be quite different than the report indicates or at least that was the preliminary intell I had read. Very strange.

[Telahnay's g'son]

I was quite surprised by that report. First up because it came as a partial now when the had said the full report would be posted on Monday. Second because it's a 180 flip-flop from the indications on the site and from other private intell I had gotten on what the report "might" contain.

This is the private intell G.B. is referring to as it's an email excerpt from Steve Kull @squatchdetective.com:

> Okay here's the skinny, Doug was Okie & Stinkchimp, his IP addresses
> matched, he proceeded to malign HIMSELF then he played it off like it was
> you. It didn't maych and he said it may have been so & so, (your friend or
> relative)
>
> Randy is basically a good guy, very enthusiastic and has the great Irish
> temper. So please forgive him, He's in the loop as well now and is
> feeling "played" as well.
>
> The truth sometimes comes out in strange ways, but I knew it would
> eventually come out.
>
> We've been played very well and we're about to wash our hands of this.
>
> If you want to sign up in the forum under a different screen name, email
> me it and don't say a thing. Just sit back and watch over the next
> couple of days. Its going to get interesting.
>
> And you're right....he's desparate. And I have the answer to the
> "million dollar question"
>
> But I'll save that for the finale ....(it shocked me....but it answers
> the quintesential question everyone's been asking lately.)
> Steve
>

We have others here who are still posting who are former friends of Doug's that will testify that there are bigfoot critters in that area. They merely differ on what the specific photo shows.

Me I dunno. I'm still a skeptic on the exisitence of such a critter and guess I will be until I see one personally or a bunch of hard tangible evidence is presented to scientist who then acknowledge it as a new species not yet identified.

I'm not aware of anyone who has ever said the photo might be a hoax, we only disagree on what it shows or what we can see in it versus what Doug thinks he sees in it. That is really the difference as to opinions of the photo.

There are other matters tho that supposedly had been proven to be quite different than the report indicates or at least that was the preliminary intell I had read. Very strange.

[Greybeard]

Yup I was privy to that but it wasn't addressed to me so I didn't feel it my place to post it or quote it directly.

I'm pretty sure that Randy is now registered here and that he is the Fireman I just gave access to this forum tonight. So perhaps tomorrow or soon he will post and shed more light on this seemingly strange reversal of positions.

For the record I don't think I'd have posted the full contents but then it wasn't directed to me either.

[bullet maker]

http://squatchdetective.com/reports/2chiggers_Report.pdf

I`m sorry, but this one went over my head? What is it trying to say? Does anybody know?

bullet maker

[John]

I might be wrong here, but looks to me like somebody was callin' someone else a good democrat. :-D

[Telahnay's g'son]

Here's the full enchilada on Mr. Kulls:

Listen put aside your disdain for me for a second.
   
  I needed to let things play out a bit without any interference.
   
  We need a truce and a truce NOW!!!!
   
  Now I can put aside your indescretion on the forum, I understand. But I have some
information where in an instance I have found, (proof positive) our mutual
"friend" was not truthful. But I am playing this out.
   
  And I know why he played it. To smear you to me. Let's just say that I had been
played for a bit, and I'm not so sure our "mutual friend" has been alone in this
endeavor.
   
  So I need some questions answered of you that you and only you know.
   
  Trust me when I say I'm not a d!@&head. I have never said a bad word about you
personally. But something has been amiss for a few weeks, and I am finally
starting to get to the bottom of this. I had to play the bad guy to someone
unfortunately both you and I played into our "mutual friend's" hands that way.
   
  Let's just say this...the coup de-grace is coming.
   
  Our mutual "friend's" actions have proved something to me, and it reeks to high
hell.
   
  Now can we have a truce??? Don't know how in the hell I got into the middle of
this anyway.
   
  But I need some input....and I'm asking for yours. You and Randy have something
going on between you, and truthfully I haven't paid much mind.
   
  Bullet Maker is everywhere on the forums, so be careful.
   
  I may have this thing wrapped up in a few days, there was a reason I removed the
pics & it had nothing to do with your actions.
   
  I need your input.
   
  So can we call a truce between the two of us like men??
   
  I am asking for a  "internet handshake."
   
  Steve
   
   

I'd say he (and his site) are truly "culls".  Especially when he sends his "ace" investigator down there (BM's place) and said person admits to trespassing on private land.  It would appear that following the law is something that's relative in their methodology.

BTW, nice pic and thanks for getting my better side.

[Telahnay's g'son]

More...

Thanks John,
   
    I appreciate it. Life is too short for antimosities.
   
    I'll give ya what I got but I need two questions answered:
   
    1. Do you know this "Okie" or "Stinkchimp" that signed up after you?
   
       If it was you (which I  pretty much know it wasn't) it does not matter, I
have a good lead. One that has shaken any "trust" in our friend. But if your
answer is what I think it's going to be, I have an important revelation to
play out, (I'll tell you) but we have to keep it secret for a few more days
while I do some digging.
   
     I'm certain now some of the stories, that our friend is telling us is BS. Randy
is new to the game is enthusiastic which gets the best of him.
   
     2. Another question is do you think our  friend prepared for the last visit and
if so would you happen to have actual knowledge of his preparation?
   
   Trust me when I say I suspected something was up. I just needed something to
prove it, AND BOY DID I FIND IT.
   

Seems he (Kulls) is more interested in playing games than serious research.  However, I guess when you're a obscure site with no real following and hafta resort to sensationalism to try and generate membership...well, it's just symptomatic of the leadership there.

Heck, look at their homepage logo!  :-D  And I didn't even get my special BF inter-dimensional decoder ring from him!  :cry:

[Telahnay's g'son]

http://squatchdetective.com/reports/2chiggers_Report.pdf

I`m sorry, but this one went over my head? What is it trying to say? Does anybody know?

bullet maker

It says a lot especially about a couple of fellows.

What is perplexing is my better-half registered (Boggy Creek) on his site on her computer and yet he took umbrage at me for it.  Must be more evidence of all that expert due diligence they conduct over at www.dontknowsquatdetective.com?  

[Telahnay's g'son]

More food for thought...

QUOTE (SWKulls @ Apr 9 2006, 03:53 PM)
HEE HAW!!!!!

Like following people around and starting trouble...all I hear now from you is

HEE HAW!!!!!  

Consider this...Kulls goes to elaborate extremes to perpetuate a ruse designed to "save face" after he was apparently taken for a ride by BM or it was a pre-meditated setup from the get-go.

In either case it reveals he (Kulls) is either incompetent as a BF "investigator/defender of the truth, et. al." OR he's just a common garden variety hoaxer.

If the first is true the how much credence should a reasonable person place in anything found on his site?

If the second is true his credibility is absolutely zero with just about anything the man has to say.

In any case how can the man be judged anything but bush league?

Remember, BF research is a mercurical endeavour as there are few (if any) real "experts" out there. I have never postulated myself as one. The risk of any website/individual posturing as the keeper of due diligence and/or benchmark of BF research quality is they're walking a fine line as the reality is there are NO benchmarks established relative to this particular effort. Yet these dudes keep on keeping on with setting up their "Bureau of BF Affairs" websites only to have the underpinnings made of clay feet.  
 

[Telahnay's g'son]

Could someone who "plays" folks (correctly defined as lying outside NYC, where it's an art form) be taken them at their word and be trusted to present evidence on anything of importance (much less BF research) as valid?

IMHO, it would appear that based upon his actions (Kulls, a department store dick and part-time bouncer) has a serious credibility problem with his word(s) rendered as basically worthless.

It only sets back the serious side of this endeavour a few more years.

[jpred1]

Well,I cannot and do not really wanna understand what the few past post were about,but I hope BM comes back.

[Graybeard]

They have now shut out all members not registered before some date in March. In order to regain entry you must e-mail the admin and ask for permission. I e-mailed and asked what was going on. I've gotten no response. I'm locked out too.

Unless I hear something real soon I'm gonna hafta begin wondering myself just what kinda credibility to place on the site. I thought they were being straight for awhile but now? Well I say something is rotten in Denmark.

[Telahnay's g'son]

Judging from his aberrant behavior of late, maybe someone else's 15 minutes of fame is coming to an end?

It musta really been crushing to his ego when the emails (he'd sent) were posted for everyone to see what a deceitful liar looks like.  Not so New Yawk smart after all but then what would anyone expect from a retail loss prevention flunkie?  Maybe he's not the CSI guru/cop wannabe he'd like everyone to believe?

[Graybeard]

It would seem that some folks have a problem with reading comprehension. I clearly stated the OK feud would NOT come to this forum. Yet Bullet Maker has made a direct attack in voliation of that.

There fore BM is no longer a member of this forum. I have not at this time disabled his GBO account but he will not be with us on this forum as it seems he wishes only to make personal attacks not talk about bigfoot.

Let no one else make a mistake and fall into the same trap he did. This forum is NOT for personal attacks it is for reporting bigfoot stories.