Author Topic: Triple 7 powder - FFG or FFFG?  (Read 1756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chappy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 84
  • Gender: Male
Triple 7 powder - FFG or FFFG?
« on: October 24, 2006, 03:55:25 AM »
I have a .50 cal T/C Omega and shoot Hornady 240 gr XTP mag bullets and sabots with CCI 209M primers.
For hunting, I load 120gr. of 777 FFG and have three quick loaders in my pocket with three 777 pellets in each.
I can quickly shoot all four of these loads without cleaning the bore and put all four shots close to the bullseye at 50 yards.
I have not had the crud ring problem others have had and I am happy with the power and accuracy of these loads.

But then a friend comes up and says he found something "better" - don't you hate that - because you know you at least have to give this new thing a try.  He says 777 FFFG works better in his rifle than 777 FFG.

My question is:  Have any of you compared 777 FFG and 777 FFFG in your rifles, and which did you prefer and why?

Thanks for your feedback!

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: Triple 7 powder - FFG or FFFG?
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2006, 05:28:02 AM »
I prefer the FFG, it is more common and easier to find that the FFFG. Also I get great accuracy with the FFG and see not need to try to improve any more than I have already. Sounds like you have a great set up now, why change?  ;)
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline mykeal

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 112
Re: Triple 7 powder - FFG or FFFG?
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2006, 08:04:49 AM »
FFFg will burn faster which is, I think, an advantage with short barrels (pistols). Slower burning FFg is better for rifles and shotguns as the longer burning time builds up a longer, flatter pressure pulse which is effective further along inside the barrel. This takes better advantage of the longer barrel on a rifle. Although, to be honest, I'm not sure you could really consistently measure the difference except with some high quality (dollar) chronograph instrumentation...

Offline slave

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 287
  • Gender: Male
Re: Triple 7 powder - FFG or FFFG?
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2006, 01:57:50 PM »
My Encore likes fffg . I let the ML decide. Other than grouping I have found the finer powdre often produces less of a crud ring.
keep your powder dry !!!

Offline vonfatman

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 155
Re: Triple 7 powder - FFG or FFFG?
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2006, 07:11:21 PM »
I like fffg 777 in my Omega.  I'm using 80gr behind a 235gr Precision Rifle sabot with wonderful results...1,750 f.p.s. at 50 yards.
However, I use 80gr ffg 777 in my Staghorn with the same sabot and have equal accuracy at 50 or 100 yards but the f.p.s. is only 1,456.
I will try ffg in my Omega after deer season because I got a "deal" on about 7lbs and will want to use it in both guns to burn it up...but only if it performs.

I agree with slave, let your gun decide.

Good luck.

Bob
"Onward Through the Fog"