This is a subject that I think deserves some discussion.
I have been in the military for 20 years now. I work with most of the weapons in todays arsonel and to be honest when I'm at home or in the woods a magazine fed black plastic rapid firer is not what I want to be carrying. (To much like work!
The single shot rifle or a good double barrel is my idea of a good day off. Bigger, Better, fasTER, MORE is just getting played out with me. Hunting with a weapon that would scare the devil out of Teddy Roosevelt just takes the sport out of hunting for me. I am fully aware that this is my opinion and I stand behind it. That is not to start an argument, my point is I prefer to test myself, not modern technology.
Every single time I have brought out one my "antiques" at the range, or hunting with others, to a person everybody has shown interest. From the .270 SB2 of my sons to the "ancient" .303 to my new found hobby the BC 45-70 every one has shown real interest. I think more and more people are turning back to "the good old days". The new guns are works of art, but they dont have character like the older models. IMHO. A classic design with a wood stock just has "class".
If H&R were to offer more older calibers I think people would by them. I really like the .303 its got tons of history and it shots well. 30-40, 7x57, and 405 have tons of history too. If you read about the golden days of hunting these are the calibers the greats got the job done with. From what the more experienced guys have posted on here it sounds like these would be great rounds to chamber in a handi in. If as HillBillyFarmer said H&R want to "fill a niche" now would be a good time to start fillin'
Have a safe and blessed hunting season.