I have an older Ruger 10-22 Deluxe that came with the "nicer" walnut stock (as opposed to that other hardwood they use on normal 10-22s). The gun was beat silly, but shoots nice. I stripped the stock, recontoured it some, raised the grain, light sand with 320. Started in using thinned coats of Tru Oil......put in several coats, drying between each coat until it acted like it would not take it any longer, then began wet sanding with 400, let the slurry fill the pores and dry for several days. Wet sand with 600, same thing. Have done this at least 4 (!) times. Finally, wetsanded with 600 and wiped off and let dry. What I ended up with is a finish that appears to be in the wood........hold it up to the light, no surface build up is evidenced. BUT what you DO see are little shiny spots where the stuff has filled the grain. You see a nice oiled up piece of polished wood with these little shiny pores.
Using my hand I rubbed in a small amount of the oil real hard all over the stock, let it dry, the used 0000 steel wool and buffed the surface real good. That removed the surface layer, and back to the wood with the shiny spots again.
One person who is a professional smith commented in passing that these cheap walnut stocks have horrendously big pores and you might just end up with those shiny spots. However, I am staring at a new (one of the last) Winchester 94s with what appears to be big pores, not sure what they used on the stock but I see no shiny pores...............the wood including the pores looks like my stocks surface but i have the shiny pores.
Any ideas? Have I removed too much finish? Keep wetsanding? Way too much work for a cheap 10-22 stock, but I WILL conquer this if it can be done
Thanks,
RR