Author Topic: Question on Ruger Tang Safety rifle  (Read 632 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26945
  • Gender: Male
Question on Ruger Tang Safety rifle
« on: October 24, 2006, 10:13:52 AM »
I have an older Ruger tang safety rifle currently chambered to 7mm Rem. Magnum. My plan when I bought it was to have it turned into a .257 Whby. Magnum for which it should be ideal but the builder tells me that's gonna be heavier than my desired weight most likely as the Ruger action is quite heavy.

So this now has me thinking that perhaps this one might be better turned into a heavier rifle for a hoped for some day trip to Africa instead.

So my question is this: Can this rifle be chambered to the .375 H&H without major work since it's a fair deal longer than the Remington Magnum? I know Ruger makes them currently and I think did in the past in the real magnum chamberings but I'm thinking that might not be the same action as I have.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline StrawHat

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 550
  • Gender: Male
Re: Question on Ruger Tang Safety rifle
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2006, 03:04:23 PM »
I read in RIFLE magazine where Scovill had a 338 converted to 375.  He also had a couple of problems but they were fixable.  If you don't have the issue let me know and I will get a copy of the article to you.

G'luck
"Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result"  Winston Churchill

"A law without a punishment is merely advice."  anonymous

Offline drdougrx

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3212
Re: Question on Ruger Tang Safety rifle
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2006, 03:47:36 PM »
HI GB

Nope....the magazine is too short.  I once read of a conversion where the bolt stop was moved more rearward to allow for bolt clearence.  Spoke to a couple of smiths who have said "no....buy an action that will fit the round".  Have you thought about the .375 taylor .375/.388)?  Same as the scovill I guess.  Or...wait till the specs on the 375 ruger are available and rechamber for that.
If you like, please enjoy some of my hunt pics at:

http://public.fotki.com/DrDougRx

If you leave a comment, please leave your GB screen name so that I can reply back!

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26945
  • Gender: Male
Re: Question on Ruger Tang Safety rifle
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2006, 05:39:50 PM »
I didn't think the H&H would fit but wanted to check with others who might have some first hand knowledge to be sure.

I've asked Jim Hack if the .375 h&H is the real minimum where he hunts or is it just the .375" bore or can the 9,3 bore also be used. Once I get all the info gathered there will be plenty of time to decide what to do with the action. The maker who will be doing it for me doesn't really want it until early next year anyway.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline gunnut69

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5005
Re: Question on Ruger Tang Safety rifle
« Reply #4 on: October 25, 2006, 07:51:05 AM »
Like the old winchesters Ruger makes a single action length, however the are a lot of parts specific to the Magnum version. The bolt stop and ejector and the mag box to name just a few. It is possible to take a lot of weight off the old M77 by converting to a standard entry front action screw. The recoil lug is removed and a washer style like the M700 uses repleces it.  Going to a blind box mag and lightening work on the action and mag box will remove even more. The result is though while lightening the action is possible there are better candidates. Check out the UltraLights buiilt by Forbes. The Remington M7 action can be really lightened but won't handle the 257 Weatherby. Likely a M700 would be the easiest way to go.  Hope this finds you feeling better!!
gunnut69--
The 2nd amendment to the constitution of the United States of America-
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Offline NoKness

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: Question on Ruger Tang Safety rifle
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2006, 05:25:01 AM »
I was under the impression that a M77 was 2 ounces heavier than a 700 BDL. was the design so weight critical that a light fill in the stock wouldn't have made up for it?

NoKnees