« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: nikon or burris  (Read 580 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline gunclub

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
nikon or burris
« on: April 10, 2007, 12:21:32 PM »
got a  new tikka varmint .223. 200yards shooting max . looking at nikon monarch 5.5-16.5x44,buckmaster 4.5-14x40 side focus ,or burris fullfield ll 4.5-14x42. monarchs are on sale getting ready a for new side focus model.which reticle would you go with?                           
Logged

Offline The Gamemaster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
Re: nikon or burris
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2007, 01:08:41 PM »
I didn't like the side focus because I thought that it had too many knobs and is just too new.

I would wait about a year or two to see if they have any problems with them before I would buy one.

The Burris is a very good reliable scope that should give you no problems.

Then again, I am a Bushnell Elite 3200 / 4200 fan myself.
Logged

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Re: nikon or burris
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2007, 01:10:59 PM »
Nikon Buckmaster!

Zachary
Logged

Offline kyelkhunter3006

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1576
  • Gender: Male
Re: nikon or burris
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2007, 02:47:18 PM »
+1 for the Buckmaster......the Elites are good too...ah, I still think it's the Buckmaster.   ;D
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »