Author Topic: Illuminated reticles, any opinions?  (Read 783 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline single hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Illuminated reticles, any opinions?
« on: May 22, 2003, 04:31:31 AM »
I've been avoiding them since they came out, but with this new(er) Sako I just picked up I'm thinking of diving into the illuminated scope line.

What are peoples actual hunting opinions of them?

Thanks
Single hunter

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Illuminated reticles, any opinions?
« Reply #1 on: May 22, 2003, 07:01:33 AM »
I can't say enough good things about them.  I own several high quality scopes with illuminated reticles and I just LOVE them and find them VERY useful when hunting.

I own 2 Leupold Vari-X IIIs in 4.5x-14x-50mm Illuminated, 1 Nightforce NXS 5.5x-22x-56mm Illuminated, and a Nikon Monarch 3.5x-10x-50mm Illuminated.

Every scope I buy I try and get it with illuminated reticles.  After using the illuminated reticles, I wonder how I ever got by without them.

I must warn you, however, that all illuminated scopes are not high quality.  Let the price generally govern quality.  For example, my Nightforce scope cost me about $1,200.  The Leupolds were about $600.  The Nikon was about $500.  These are all GREAT scopes.  Do not get a BSA illuminated scope for $100.  In my opinion, most scopes under $100 are essentially junk, so don't expect the quality of the illuminated reticle in such scopes to be of high quality.

An illuminated reticle on you Sako would be a great investment in my opinion.

Zachary :grin:

Offline single hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Illuminated reticles, any opinions?
« Reply #2 on: May 22, 2003, 07:19:09 PM »
I've been looking over the euro scopes. I bought the 7X50 SLC's bino's from SWFA two years ago and had to up-grade a very nice Burris 4X20mm compact and a Nikon 2-7X32 Monarch UCC scope because of the bino's ability to see further into the dusk time frame than my mid-line scopes were capable of.  Nothing worse than being able to look at bucks through the bino's and not be able to draw the reticles down on them.

That should be a person criteria for puchasing a scope. Only as good as their bino's are. It will do nothing more than piss a person off.  

Anywho, Swarovski's and Zeiss are my first two choices. Besides it just seems right putting a euro scope on a Sako.

I'll check out the nightforce scope, never even heard of them.

Thanks
Single Hunter

Offline TheOpticZone

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
    • http://www.theopticzone.com
Illuminated reticles, any opinions?
« Reply #3 on: May 23, 2003, 01:11:58 AM »
Single Hunter,

If you are planning on hunting with this gun, I would not even consider the Nightforce.  They are great optically, but you are going to be lugging a pretty darn big scope through the woods.  The illuminated reticle is great under very low light situations, but you still have to able to see the game through the scope to make a shot.  So if you do plan on getting a scope with an illuminated reticle, make sure you get one that has great optics too.
Jon Jackoviak
The Optic Zone
www.theopticzone.com

The Place for all your Optic Needs!

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Illuminated reticles, any opinions?
« Reply #4 on: May 23, 2003, 03:49:06 AM »
Actually, Jon is right about the Nightforce being heavy, and thus not a great choice for hunting.  My Nightforce weighs somthing like 32 or 33 oz. :eek:   These scopes are used for 1,000 yd. and 2,000 yd. competitions with the 50 BMGs. :eek:

I have the Nightforce on my Remington Sendero SF in .300 Win. Mag.  With the heavy duty rings and bases, the dang thing weighs close to 11 pounds.  However, I don't do much of stalking and walking with that gun when hunting.  Rather, I just sit in a tower blind and take shots as I see fit.  As such, the heavy weight, under these situations, is not a factor.  But I would never use such a gun and scope on a stalking hunt.

Now, I was not advocating putting a Nightforce on your Sako, but I just wanted to let you know that I have experience with Illuminated reticles (which the Nightforce scopes have standard).

Yes, the Zeiss and Swarovski scopes have illuminated reticles too.  And if you can afford to spend about $1,500 then I would get it.  However, for about half the price, you can get the Leupolds.  They are light, have easy 1" tubes, and they have great glass (at least in the Vari-X III models).  Leupold does not put illuminated reticles on their lower lines, just on their higher lines.

I may end up getting an Illuminated Zeiss or Swarovski within the next year or two.  But, in the meantime, the Leupolds are just awesome!

Zachary

Offline TheOpticZone

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 656
    • http://www.theopticzone.com
Illuminated reticles, any opinions?
« Reply #5 on: May 23, 2003, 03:54:50 AM »
Zachary,

Just a little new info for you.  All the 2003 Leupold Illuminated scopes have a 30mm tube.
Jon Jackoviak
The Optic Zone
www.theopticzone.com

The Place for all your Optic Needs!

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Illuminated reticles, any opinions?
« Reply #6 on: May 23, 2003, 07:49:12 AM »
Wow :eek:  I didn't know that.  I'll have to go to Leupold's website and check it out.

Zachary

Offline Zachary

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3713
Illuminated reticles, any opinions?
« Reply #7 on: May 23, 2003, 12:05:55 PM »
I am very interested in the new Fire Fly models.  In fact, I have decided in buying an Elite 3200 1.5x-4.5x-32mm Fire Fly for my .375 H&H Mag.

Zachary