Author Topic: S&W Model 59  (Read 1676 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline crashresidue

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74
S&W Model 59
« on: May 25, 2003, 05:39:47 PM »
Cheers gentlemen,

I've jumped over from the BPCR forum with a question about the Model 59.

I bought a few handguns from a neighbor and one was this model.  I really like it, but am now hearing that she has/had a problem with sear(sp?) breakage that caused her to go "full auto" for the remaining rounds in the clip - usually taking out the shooter.

Now I know that this is an "old style" gun -1971-82 but she's a "sweet shooter" and I'd hate to loose her.

Does anyone out there have any info on this?

Also any creative ideas on what to do with a "Sterling" 22 semi auto?  My first thought was to make it a "trolling weight" - I'll be d*amned if I'll shoot this little piece of ****!

Anyway,

Gentle winds,
cr
When all else fails, call for the gunships!

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
Model 59
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2003, 08:43:23 AM »
Crash:  I was involved with the Illinois State Police selection process when they retired their Colt Python 357s in favor of the S&W Model 39, the single stack magazine version of your Model 59.  Many thousands of rounds were fired through each test pistol without any breakage to the sears.  The only problems we found were that the pistol came in only 9mm and not 38 Super, which was the preferred cartridge by the ISP and that some simply would not feed hollow-points.  If yours does, then enjoy the pistol, there is nothing wrong with it.

As for the Sterling:  Got one!  Shoot it once in a while.  At least once in every clipful she goes full auto for two or sometimes 3 shots.  I haven't found a place to get it repaired and my local gunsmiths don't know anything about them, so I include the full auto possibility in my training with it.  Mine has never jammed on me, so going full auto once in a clipful doesn't bother me.   If yours has feeding problems you probably need a new magazine and those are availalbe through the Shotgun News.  I will grant you that Sterlings, Jennings and some of the other 22s aren't quality handguns but if you can get one to work reliably they become inexpensive insurance.  Hope this helps.  Mikey.

Offline daddywpb

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
S&W Model 59
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2003, 11:11:56 AM »
I still have an early Model 39 that has had literally ten thousand rounds through it, and it still works and shoots great. I've heard stories about the alloy frame not holding up too. It's all a bunch of crap. In my opinion, the 39 and 59 were some of the best autos ever to come out of S&W. Take it out and shoot it and enjoy it!

I also have a stainless Sterling .22 that I bought new 25 years ago. It has traveled many miles riding in a pocket holster, and the only problem I ever had was a broken extractor that I ordered from a parts warehouse and replaced. I wouldn't shoot a thousand rounds a week through one, but the quality is far above the Jennings and Brycos and the like. I've enjoyed mine over the years.

Offline Gerald McDonald

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 15
S&W Model 59
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2003, 03:50:06 PM »
Had a 59 years ago, mine gave me plenty of grief, not so with a 39 that I wish I still had. Have a smith check it out if you have concerns. I have a sterling 302 22lr, it wont feed the last round from the mag but otherwise goes bang every time with pretty good accuracy for what it is.

Offline crashresidue

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74
Model 59 vs 39
« Reply #4 on: May 27, 2003, 05:53:44 PM »
Cheers gentlemen,

Thanks for the replys!  Now, my next question is: did the 39 have the same extractor as the 59?

Any gunsmiths out there with an answer?

I'll write S&W tonight and ask - these folks have been GREAT so far with all my little "piddly-a**ed" questions about the 59.   Even sent me the owners manual!  What a DEAL!

Gentle winds,
crashresidue
When all else fails, call for the gunships!

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
39 vs 59
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2003, 08:05:06 AM »
Crash:  I believe the only difference was in the frame.  The 39 had an all steel single stack magazine frame, the 59 I believe was an alloy frame for a staggered magazine.  Otherwise, I believe the tops were the same and possibly interchangeable but I'm not certain about the last one.  Hope this helps.  Mikey.

Offline jhm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3169
S&W Model 59
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2003, 12:16:22 PM »
Crash:  Actually both models came with steel and allow frames the extractor should be the same there was a model # change on the 59 to a 559 that was a steel frame and if memory serves me correct I believe it was also changed on the 39 but dont quote me as I am not 100% sure on that, as far as a shooter goes I have a 39-2 and I love it, when carrying it I am sure it will fire and when it does it will hit what I intend to hit, wish my other handguns were as accurate, quite carring because was hoping it would go up in value some day, the little sterling 22 auto had both the 22 and the 25 years ago and I liked the little 22 over the 25 much better both were in stainless and today someone else has them, never had a problem with the 22 however the 25 was a different story. :D   JIM