Author Topic: range report on taurus 1911  (Read 809 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline myronman3

  • Moderator
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4837
  • Gender: Male
range report on taurus 1911
« on: June 12, 2007, 05:55:05 AM »
my pops recently bought a taurus 1911 and brought it up,  we took it out and shot it.  here is what i think of it, so far....

report... the pt 1911 dad bought fed reliably, was accurate, and ejected without a hitch.  the frontstrap checkering was not effective,  but him and i remedied that later.  the heinie sights were o.k.,  but i would have liked the front sight to be tritium dot; then i would say they would have been great.  the mags worked fine, dad had one aftermarket high cap that i knew at a glance wasnt gonna work. the mags that came with the gun worked without a hitch.  the trigger, while not on par with my kimber, wasnt bad.  the grips were hard plastic.  there are plenty of aftermarket options to fix that with minimal effort; if one was inclined.  the ones on it will work.   all and all i would rate the particular gun i shot as solid and reliable.  if i were in the market for a 1911,  i would go for a kimber first,  but the taurus did better than i expected.   if only taurus treated others on g.b.o. better i would suggest it.  for now all i will say is that the particular pistol i shot was a solid gun.  time will tell on the durabiltiy of it, as we will send plenty of rounds through it in the years to come.   

Offline Savage

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4397
Re: range report on taurus 1911
« Reply #1 on: June 12, 2007, 02:52:46 PM »
myronman3,
My experiences with the PT1911 have been similar to yours. I have had mine about 7 mos now, with no problems or major complaints. The pistol is well worth the $480 I paid for it. I have recently seen them selling in the $600 range at gun shows. At that point, I be putting a few bucks with it and buying another Kimber. I would still recommend the PT1911 as a good entry level 1911 that doesn't need a lot of add-ons to be serviceable. I think it's a better buy than the Mil-Specs or GI replicas.
Savage
An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last,

Offline greener

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 83
Re: range report on taurus 1911
« Reply #2 on: June 12, 2007, 05:42:40 PM »
I've had one for 3 weeks and can't find anything wrong with it.  Good trigger, good sights and an overall solid pistol.  With the right ammo, it seems to be very capable of tight groups at 15 yards.  I've fired a couple of Kimbers.  They are excellent pistols.  However, I'm not sure see enough difference between the Taurus and a Custom II to justify dropping 2x the $$$. 

Offline myronman3

  • Moderator
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4837
  • Gender: Male
Re: range report on taurus 1911
« Reply #3 on: June 13, 2007, 03:12:30 AM »
dad said he paid 6 for his.  @ that price, a few bucks more i'd go with kimber.  but if $480,  another story altogether.  now we are talking milspec price and it is heads and shoulders above a springer milspec.  so i guess it depends onwhat they are selling for.

Offline Heavy C

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1088
  • Gender: Male
Re: range report on taurus 1911
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2007, 04:05:56 AM »
What was the deal with the font strap checkering that you remedied?

Offline myronman3

  • Moderator
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4837
  • Gender: Male
Re: range report on taurus 1911
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2007, 05:04:05 AM »
the checkering wasnt effective.   looked nice but it was too smooth to be effective.  i put a piece of non slip tape over it and now it grips the hand.