CCI made what they called the SGB (small game bullet) for some years, then quit. Apparently due to demand the SGB is back <
www.cci-ammunition.com/ >
The E. Arthur Brown Co. makes a hollow pointing tool which I may just purchase yet . <
www.eabco.com/holoptr.html >
Paco has a tool that compresses and reforms the point into a hollow, flat or nasti-nose point <
www.leverguns.com/ >
I made my own Paco style tool and found that this tool helps 2 ways..reforms the nose and compresses the bullet, so it is a tighter fit into the rifling in most rifles.
The tool I made however, crowds the rifles with Bentz chambers a bit much. They do seem to have a bit more zap than comparable solid points when used on an
inanimate medium.
All the target shooting and tests don't prove a thing to me as much as 60 years hunting..hollowpoints have more punch
Now, in subsonics 1000-1050 fps if you reach beyond 50 yds, they may not upset very much, but if a .270 goes far enough before it hits, it won't deform much either..
Most .22s fired from a short handgun barrel lose enough velocity that they may not open either..
My experience with solid vs hollow points is primarily with woodchucks at moderate ranges (up tyo 75 yards) and shooting coon out of trees. I have used same brand & style in many of these hunts, with solid or hollow points being the only difference..and I KNOW the hollowpoints hit harder..
Either one is good for squirrel, esp for head shots..
Below is a pic from the CCI website showing their SGB. They say it is ideal for squirrel and other edible small game, because it doesn't do as much "damage to the meat" as the hollowpoint does.
In varmint hunting (e.g. woodchucks & PDs... meat damage is just what we want !