Author Topic: recoil: blackpowder vs. smokeless  (Read 524 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vanbuzen9

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 197
  • Gender: Male
recoil: blackpowder vs. smokeless
« on: March 22, 2008, 11:27:47 AM »
Hey guys,

I was shooting my tc encore today with some handloaded 375 winchester shells.  I was pushing a 225 gr hornady psp with 35 grains of H322.  Based on my loading manual, this was giving me about 2000 fps.  I then proceeded to switch out my barrels, and put my 50 cal. muzzleloading barrel on.  I decided to use a practice load of 300 grain xtp pushed by 70 grains of triple 7, for a published velocity of 1400 fps. 

To my amazement, the black powder load seemed to have kicked as much, if not more than the 375 load.  When I got home and calculated the recoils from both loads, the 375 gave around 15 ft-lbs, and the BP load gave around 20 ft-lbs.  I was wondering, does the bp load kick more than the other just because it has twice the amount of powder?  I know that powder weight has to be taken into consideration when calculating recoil, but I thought that black powder was less "energetic" than smokeless.  Any thoughts on this subject?

thanks,
vanbuzen9

Offline wncchester

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3856
  • Gender: Male
Re: recoil: blackpowder vs. smokeless
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2008, 11:43:21 AM »
There is little, if any, difference attributable to the difference in powders, as such.  What you experienced was primarily caused by the difference in bullet weights and the more rapid acceleration of the BP load.
Common sense is an uncommon virtue

Offline gypsyman

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4852
Re: recoil: blackpowder vs. smokeless
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2008, 11:55:42 AM »
Black powder is more of an explosion, where smokeless is a controlled burn. Granted it's only mili-seconds, but there is a difference. The shape of the stock will also give you a different ''feel''.   gypsyman
We keep trying peace, it usually doesn't work!!Remember(12/7/41)(9/11/01) gypsyman

Offline Lead pot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 743
  • Gender: Male
Re: recoil: blackpowder vs. smokeless
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2008, 12:05:04 PM »
DDDDoes mmy bbbig .50-90 SSSShars kkkkick mmore loaded with 118 grains of 2F Goex and a 720 grain lead bullet then my .458 yyyes iit does, but it hurts so good!!!
Dont go were the path leads,go were there is no path and leave a trail.

Offline wncchester

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3856
  • Gender: Male
Re: recoil: blackpowder vs. smokeless
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2008, 03:14:53 AM »
"....yyyes iit does, but it hurts so good!!!!!!"

Lead, I don't want to spoil your fun but you might benefit from backing off a couple of grains in that 50-90.    ;)
Common sense is an uncommon virtue

Offline coyotejoe

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2937
  • Gender: Male
Re: recoil: blackpowder vs. smokeless
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2008, 06:13:59 AM »
"Cartridges of the World" has a reprint of an old Winchester ballistics chart from 1906, which includes "free recoil in foot pounds". Most cartridges were produced with a choice of black or smokeless powder and in every instance the black powder showed a greater recoil, in some cases as much as 75% greater! And yes, it is due to the much greater powder charge weight plus the fact that black powder has to accelerate most of its' weight down the bore in the form of solid particulates. Lots of folks will say "oh the recoil of black powder is more of a slow shove than a sharp kick" but I've never noticed anything like that and it doesn't stand up to reason. Since the recoil energy depends on gun weight and recoil velocity, for the same gun to have more recoil energy it must have more recoil velocity.
The story of David & Goliath only demonstrates the superiority of ballistic projectiles over hand weapons, poor old Goliath never had a chance.

Offline jgalar

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1231
  • Gender: Male
Re: recoil: blackpowder vs. smokeless
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2008, 03:15:35 AM »
The weight of the powder charge IS included when figuring recoil.