Author Topic: Anyone made a 300 yard big game kill using 30/30 lever revolution ammo?  (Read 5836 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline ba_50

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Gender: Male
I'm especially interested in its effect on elk at 300.

I hear Winchester brought out this bullet style. Is that true?

Offline jimster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2237
  • Gender: Male
I'm not a good enough to shoot 300 yards at game with my 30-30.  Plus, my 30-30 does not have enough power to reasonably kill elk at 300 yards, even if I could see that far, and shoot that far with open sights.  So I guess it doesn't matter if they have a super bullet in my case.  I still couldn't do it. 

Offline Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18255
now im a big fan of the 3030. Ive killed lots of game with one using cast and jacketed bullets. Ive not used revolution ammo as i dont really believe in the purpose. A 3030 is a real fine 200 yard whitetail gun if sighted in properly with corelocks. I dont care what magic bullet you try its not going to be any more of a gun then that. Now im sure lots of elk have been killed by a 3030 so im not dumb enough to claim it isnt up to the task But 300 yards is a stretch for good bolt gun shooting a 308 or 3006 when elk hunting and im of the opinion youd be undergunned for the job. Now if you were asking what bullet to use for a 50 yard shot at an elk id tell you to tote your 3030 with a 170 corelock and you will have a gun and load that will get the job done. Any bullet used in a 3030 at 2200 fps that will still expand at 300 yards at the low velocity it will be traveling would have to be so thin jacketed that it would never hold up at 50 yards. I would have to guess that even hornady, that has some pretty inflated ideas on what this revelution ammo can do, would balk at recomending it for 300 yard shooting at something as big as an elk.
blue lives matter

Offline Blackhawk44

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 981
Sorry to be a kill-joy, but experienced hunters don't consider a .308's non-premium 165gr bullets at almost 2700fps a "good" elk load at almost any range, so why should a 160gr (not 165) deer bullet at 2550fps (actual speed) out of a .30-30 be a better load?  By the way, what do your 300 yard bench rest groups look like with that rig? 

For clarification, the load was created by, and exclusive to, Hornady not Winchester.

Offline ba_50

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Gender: Male
Based on my hunting and target shooting experience, ( elk, pronghorn, mule deer , Alaska moose and coyotes) I wouldn't hesitate to shoot an elk with my 30/06 loaded with 165's or 180's at 300 yards. I've used a 30/06 out to 1000 yards, on  paper, so 300 yards isn't a tough  shot. Shot placement is the most important part, along with a good bullet.

I am also wondering how well my 30/30 would shoot those new loads as I haven't tried them yet.

Come to think of it, it was in the back of my mind that this load was close to the .308 performance, but I was thinking of the new express, not the 30/30. That puts a different slant on it doesn't it? I went to the Hornady site and looked at the 30/30 ballistics and was rather impressed because the LR round has only 100 ft# less energy at 300 yards that the 170 has at 100 yards.

I heard that Winchester came out with this same type bullet but that's just here say.

Offline Blackhawk44

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 981
Excuse me, I was thinking .308 Marlin also.  For the .30-30 the answer is NO.  Attempting elk at 300 yds with a .30-30 anything is unethical and immoral for showing such a lack of consideration for the game hunted.   

Offline ba_50

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 222
  • Gender: Male
Excuse me, I was thinking .308 Marlin also.  For the .30-30 the answer is NO.  Attempting elk at 300 yds with a .30-30 anything is unethical and immoral for showing such a lack of consideration for the game hunted.   

I'm not much on ballistics and what it proves, but I don't think it would be unethical to shoot an elk at 100 Yards with a 170 30/30 bullet even though I've never done it. And since the LR bullet has the same energy at not quite 300 as the 170@100, wouldn't it make sense that it should work too? Sounds good on paper anyhow.

Offline T.R.

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 466







My Grandad hunted with his long barreled model 94 from about 1910 until 1970. That's 60 years of toppling every species of big game animal that roams Wyoming.  He didn't read magazines or gun catalogs but he knew what his 30-30 would do to animals.

My first three elk fell to his battered 30-30 carbine.  They were shot at varying distances from about 80 - 100 yards or so.  The rule Grandad hunted by was simple: shoot into the chest from side angle and keep shooting until the animal is down.

I've hunted elk successfully nearly every season with .308 for many years.  I feel that 30-30 doesn't have the reach for those long shots beyond 225 yards or so.  I'm not convinced that changing the shape of a hunting bullet makes 30-30 a genuine 300 yard elk cartridge.  In my opinion, 30-30 is quite useful under 200 yards no matter what ammo brand or type is used. Shooting beyond this distance may lead to disappointment.

Nearly everyone knows somebody with a good 30-06.  Borrow it for that elk hunt.

TR

Offline NickSS

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 384
I have not tried the new ammo from Hornady yet but I have used a 30-30 for years for various hunting situations.  I think it is a fine cartridge for deer out to a maximum of 200 yards and I would not feel like it was inadequate for elk at 100 yards or less.  I have seen too many people who think horsepower in a rifle cartridge automatically make for better killing ability.  To a certain extent this is true but bullet placement and bullet construction has a lot more to do with it.

I have no doubt that a 30-30 firing almost any bullet can kill an elk at 300 yards but I also think that a lot more elk would be wounded than killed quickly with one.  I have spent many years helping hunters sight in their rifles prior to  hunting season at my gun club.  In all these years I have seen only about 10% of the hunters who really can shoot well.  The rest are either average to poor shots.  Before you go off to hunt elk with any rifle at 300 yards go to a rifle range and take a typical hunting shooting position and shoot at the target with your sights set as you would normally have them prior to hunting season.  If you can shoot three shots from a clean barrel and all fall into a 12 inch circle on the target you are ready to hunt at 300 yards.  If you can't do this do not try long range shots until you can.

Offline WyoStillhunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
First, T.R. always makes sense on topics like this.  And thanks for the pictures.

One thing hasn't been mentioned.  That is the fact that elk frequently give no reaction they have been hit by a bullet, especially at longer ranges.  They may take off at the shot but often show no visual evidence of a lethal hit, much less a non-lethal wound.

Too many hunters shoot, see no immediate evidence of a hit, and walk on to continue hunting when they may have actually killed an elk.  At 300 yards the chances of this happening are even greater, regardless of ammo choice.

I hope we can agree that putting "elk" and "30-30" and "300 yards" into the same question is purely hypothetical and not something to consider doing in the real world.
Quote
Hunt close, then get closer.

Offline Cabin4

  • Avery H. Wallace
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4938
  • Gender: Male
  • Out West
Re: Anyone made a 300 yard big game kill using 30/30 lever revolution ammo?
« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2008, 08:49:56 AM »


While I am a big fan of the 30-30, I do have reservations about it being a 300 yard elk gun even with the new Hornady Leverevolution ammo. Having said this, the 30-30 with a 160 grain Leverevolution load has more energy at 300 yards than the 44mag 5 inch bbl has with the muzzle with the 300 grain XTP.

44mag revolver 300 gr XTP muzzle energy = 881
30-30 Leverevolution 160 gr energy at 300 yards= 1025

I'm not trying to compare these two bullets. But it is interesting to compare and contrast the numbers. Yes, the 44 mag 300 gr XTP bullet will have better forward momentum due to its weight advantage and its a proven performer. Many an Elk have fallen to the 44mag revolver.

The 30-30 can kill an Elk in my opinion clearly in the 150 yard range with the right load properly placed. So its seems like a reasonable question to ask about the 30-30 when comparing the numbers to the 44. How do these leverrevolution rounds perform on game,,,, i don't know. I have shot them thru my 30-30 and 45-70 and I don't get the accuracy I like. So I won't use them.


Avery Hayden Wallace
Obama Administration: A corrupt criminal enterprise of bold face liars.
The States formed the Union. The Union did not form the States. States Rights!
GET US OUT OF THE UN. NO ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT!
S.A.S.S/NRA Life Member/2nd Amendment Foundation
CCRKBA/Gun Owners of America
California Rifle & Pistol Association
Ron Paul Was Right!
Long Live the King! #3

Offline One Eye

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 139
  • Gender: Male
Excuse me, I was thinking .308 Marlin also.  For the .30-30 the answer is NO.  Attempting elk at 300 yds with a .30-30 anything is unethical and immoral for showing such a lack of consideration for the game hunted.   
Immoral?  Really?   Luckily, I do not look to you or anyone else to police my ethics or behavior.
Dan
"A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." ~ Thomas Jefferson

Offline kyelkhunter3006

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1576
  • Gender: Male
Sorry to be a kill-joy, but experienced hunters don't consider a .308's non-premium 165gr bullets at almost 2700fps a "good" elk load at almost any range, so why should a 160gr (not 165) deer bullet at 2550fps (actual speed) out of a .30-30 be a better load?  By the way, what do your 300 yard bench rest groups look like with that rig? 

For clarification, the load was created by, and exclusive to, Hornady not Winchester.

I think that this blanket statement is not on track at all.  I personally don't think that the 30/30 LE is a 300 yd elk round, but if you think that a 165gr "regular" bullet @ 2700 fps won't kill an elk at 300 yds, well, jeez, what do you suggest?.  The Nosler Partition was the first readily available "premium" bullet, and it wasn't developed until 1948.  What, before then, did people not shoot elk?  Or did the "regular" bullets just bounce off of their armored hides?    ???  The largest elk in the B&C book for years was the Plute elk, killed in 1899.  It was shot with a 30/40 Krag, with "regular" bullets.  Same goes with the 30/30, 45/70, .303 Brit., 7x57, 6.5x55, YEARS before John's super bullet.  And on game bigger then elk, at ranges sometimes longer than 300 yds.

There has been more game killed with regular bullets than the "premium" bullets will ever probably accomplish, from elk to elephants.  Any decent brand game bullet will kill an elk at 300 yds from the proper cartridge, including the .308, .270, 30-06, 7x57, or the 30/30 LE, etc.  Hit'em in the ribs (lungs, heart) from a broad side shot, they will bleed and die.  Honestly, I would be more concerned about close range shots and too much expansion limiting penetration from "regular" bullets than the longer distances with them.

I hear and read a lot of people talking about killing deer, elk, caribou, pronghorn (insert the animal of your choice here) at 500 yds with their 7mm Rem Mag or 300 Win Mag.  I am also the first to say that unless you've got a range finder, most people wouldn't realize how far 500 yds is if you mapped it out for them.  But in the interest of comparisons, if you look at ballistics tables, those rounds with 150-175 gr bullets in the 7 Mag and 180 gr loads in the 300 Mag (Remington Ballistic tables) all have about 1100 lbs of energy at 500 yds.  Very similar to the 30-30 LE at 300 yds.   :o

If the gun was accurate enough (and yourself from field positions) for 300 yds shots, then I'd shoot a deer at 300 yds with the 30/30 LE without a second's hesitation.  An elk, um, maybe not at 300, but I would at 200-250 yds.  In the ribs, where the bullets belong.  I read about needing "premium" bullets just case you need to take a raking shot or rear end shot, so that the bulllet will make it to the vitals.  Ok, if you like shooting animals in the ass on a regular basis at long range, then maybe you'd need a .340 Weatherby with Trophy Bonded bullets.  If you're jump shooting elk in dark timber, then I'd go with a 45/70 with Buffalo Bore or Garret Hard Cast ammo to produce big bloody holes through and through and a quick tracking job.

I've never went elk hunting as of yet, with a wife, 3 kids, and a mortgage, there's always a better way to spend $5000.   ;)  I have talked with several outfitters at trade shows and on-line, and to a T, they all recommended a .270 or 30-06 with heavy for caliber bullets of my choice, or a .300 if the recoil didn't bother my shooting.  They didn't care what the bullet was, as long as it's a game bullet.  One of them uses a 7mm Rem Mag with Winchester Power Points (regular bullet) and another uses a 30-06 with Remington Core-Lokts.  They also told me that they only way they were going to let someone shoot past 300 yds was if they were a sniper (past or present day and could prove it) or if the animal was wounded already and they were trying to put it down.

BTW, Winchester does have a 30/30 load with a soft-tipped bullet, it's the 30/30 Ballistic Silvertip.  It's profile isn't as sharp as the Hornady, and it's a 150gr load.  IMO, the .308 Marlin Express would do in an elk at 300 yds without issue.  It carries almost a 1000lbs of energy to 500 yds.  If the gun and I were accurate enough, 300 yds would not pose a problem for it.