Author Topic: .44 Mag Loads for bear  (Read 8740 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18258
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #30 on: June 27, 2008, 12:44:02 AM »
Ive been using cast bullets for 30 years and have never witnessed cooked on lube before. Im about the laziest sob in the country when it comes to cleaning guns. My guns get cleaned about once a year or when they wont function properly. Maybe once or twice a year on a gun that is used alot i will hose them off with brake cleaner. I know some of my guns have gone well over 10000 rounds without a cleaning. One thing i do though is if a gun leads i fix it so it doesnt. I can keep my guns lead free with an occasional jacketed bullet run thorugh them or even a gas checked bullet. Sure cast may be a tad dirtier due to the lube but the cost of lead vs jacket well makes up for that little inconvienence. As far as leading goes any gun that leads will also copper foul and leads a heck of alot eaiser to remove then copper. Only advantage and the only time i will use jacketed bullets is in some forms of competition smoke is a pain and cast bullets due smoke. Bottom line is cast is far superior to jacketed in the hunting field and even if i had to clean my gun occasionaly i would still use them and the fact that they are about half the price if you dont cast yourself and about 10 times cheaper if you do cast is just icing on the cake. Personaly i dont believe anyone, other then a filthy rich man, could possibly ever shoot enough to truely master a gun unless he used cast bullets. When i go to the range i will sometimes shoot 500 rounds and very seldom under 200 and at 20 bucks a hundred it would get pretty expensive when you figure im there 3 times a week or more. quote author=Lone Star link=topic=146543.msg1098602267#msg1098602267 date=1214363585]
Quote
What hassle with cast bullets?????????
I hate to be the one to break it to you, but anyone who has used cast bullets for many years - I started casting in 1970 - realizes at some point that they are just not as easy on the reloader or the shooter as are store-bought jacketed bullets.  To many shooters the joy of casting  and the cleaning of cooked-on lube are considered hassles - just ask a hundred average shooters at any range.  You and I may not agree with that, but then we are in the minority of most shooters. 



.
[/quote]
blue lives matter

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #31 on: June 27, 2008, 01:50:16 AM »
Ive been using cast bullets for 30 years and have never witnessed cooked on lube before. Im about the laziest sob in the country when it comes to cleaning guns. My guns get cleaned about once a year or when they wont function properly. Maybe once or twice a year on a gun that is used alot i will hose them off with brake cleaner. I know some of my guns have gone well over 10000 rounds without a cleaning. One thing i do though is if a gun leads i fix it so it doesnt. I can keep my guns lead free with an occasional jacketed bullet run thorugh them or even a gas checked bullet. Sure cast may be a tad dirtier due to the lube but the cost of lead vs jacket well makes up for that little inconvienence. As far as leading goes any gun that leads will also copper foul and leads a heck of alot eaiser to remove then copper. Only advantage and the only time i will use jacketed bullets is in some forms of competition smoke is a pain and cast bullets due smoke. Bottom line is cast is far superior to jacketed in the hunting field and even if i had to clean my gun occasionaly i would still use them and the fact that they are about half the price if you dont cast yourself and about 10 times cheaper if you do cast is just icing on the cake. Personaly i dont believe anyone, other then a filthy rich man, could possibly ever shoot enough to truely master a gun unless he used cast bullets. When i go to the range i will sometimes shoot 500 rounds and very seldom under 200 and at 20 bucks a hundred it would get pretty expensive when you figure im there 3 times a week or more. quote author=Lone Star link=topic=146543.msg1098602267#msg1098602267 date=1214363585]


I agree with your statement  ( Personaly i dont believe anyone, other then a filthy rich man, could possibly ever shoot enough to truely master a gun unless he used cast bullets.)
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline Cottonwood

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2780
  • Gender: Male
  • "Capturing the moment, to last a lifetime"
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #32 on: June 27, 2008, 02:22:11 AM »
I use Rim Rock Bullets exclusivly in a 305-gr WFN GC with H110 powder for all my hunting needs.


Offline Lone Star

  • Reformed Gunwriter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2359
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #33 on: June 27, 2008, 07:34:44 AM »
Quote
Ive been using cast bullets for 30 years and have never witnessed cooked on lube before. Im about the laziest sob in the country when it comes to cleaning guns....

That's all very nice I'm sure, but the reality is that most non-CB users believe their use is a hassle - just like most shooters believe that handloading is dangerous/time consuming/not worth it. 

Argue til you're blue in the face if you wish, but nothing you nor I nor anyone else can say will change that reality.      ::)



.

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #34 on: June 27, 2008, 09:00:13 AM »
Quote
Ive been using cast bullets for 30 years and have never witnessed cooked on lube before. Im about the laziest sob in the country when it comes to cleaning guns....

That's all very nice I'm sure, but the reality is that most non-CB users believe their use is a hassle - just like most shooters believe that handloading is dangerous/time consuming/not worth it. 

Argue til you're blue in the face if you wish, but nothing you nor I nor anyone else can say will change that reality.      ::)



.


So exactly what is your point???
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline Cottonwood

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2780
  • Gender: Male
  • "Capturing the moment, to last a lifetime"
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #35 on: June 27, 2008, 09:16:49 AM »
Here is a handloading cost calculator

http://www.handloads.com/calc/loadingCosts.asp

I'll stick with reloading.

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #36 on: June 27, 2008, 10:16:54 AM »
I much prefer hard cast bullets?
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Online Lloyd Smale

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18258
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #37 on: June 27, 2008, 11:34:33 PM »
your probably right. Theres alot of people that dont believe in handloading but ive yet to see one that could shoot.
Quote
Ive been using cast bullets for 30 years and have never witnessed cooked on lube before. Im about the laziest sob in the country when it comes to cleaning guns....

That's all very nice I'm sure, but the reality is that most non-CB users believe their use is a hassle - just like most shooters believe that handloading is dangerous/time consuming/not worth it. 

Argue til you're blue in the face if you wish, but nothing you nor I nor anyone else can say will change that reality.      ::)



.
blue lives matter

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #38 on: August 01, 2008, 10:34:30 AM »
Just got this in an email and thought it kind of went along with this post, in a joking way?

"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline countryrebel

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 108
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #39 on: August 03, 2008, 07:11:43 AM »
Thanks for the sign SB. I am still laughing.  :)

Offline teddy12b

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3078
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #40 on: August 04, 2008, 01:42:34 AM »
It never fails that every year before I leave for a bear hunt that I e-mail gets a couple eye opening messages about bear attacks and little signs like that.  I know I'll be safe, but I also know there is still a chance for danger, but that's all part of the fun.

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #41 on: August 04, 2008, 02:20:06 AM »
Rushes, aren't bad things, as long as your aware of them and their dangers? They keep us on our toes.
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline warrior1

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 618
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #42 on: August 04, 2008, 07:12:29 AM »
s.b. i believe your question was pretty much answered. have a good trip, dan
Dan Deluca aka "warrior1" has passed away.  Dan was a frequent poster here and on several other sites.  He passed away on 12/29/08 from a massive heart attack. RIP Dan.

Offline corbanzo

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2405
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #43 on: August 04, 2008, 07:30:36 AM »
Saw a really pretty black bear yesterday, but he was small.  I was trying to reason in my head that he was pretty enough to make up for his size. 

The the lady told me to quit, and I wasn't gonna shoot a bear that small... OK....  hahahaha.. women. 

I was carrying the .44mag with 320 grain WFNGC over about 20 grains of H110...  felt like way plenty at the time. 

Had some 300 grains JFP's with me also, they also, felt like plenty. 
"At least with a gun that big, if you miss and hit the rocks in front of him it'll stone him to death..."

Offline teddy12b

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3078
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #44 on: August 04, 2008, 08:00:04 AM »
It's a weird coincidence that you brought up the 320gr WFNGC rounds in your 44.  I'm going to load some of those up tonight for a puma 44 and it might be a packup gun for a bear hunt here in two weeks.

Offline Default

  • Classified -- Banned
  • Trade Count: (13)
  • A Real Regular
  • *
  • Posts: 766
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #45 on: August 26, 2008, 10:11:36 AM »
ok guys,

   I have to put out there that a good 240 gn JSP 44 mag should do just fine for the blackie as well as white tail ....the Hornady XTP 240 gn JHP 44 should do well also ...... my first deer kill with the 44 mag was at 40 yards running ,double lung (bought a baseball size hole exit side ..need i say more?) deer made a 40 yard sprint after the shot .. Last year my other halfs uncle came down a got onto a 225 to 240 blackie with a XTP 44 mag loading , One and done!

  later after we all got around for skinning the bear i measured a 18 inch path of travel from the frontal quatering entrance to the final resting place of the xtp 3 to 4 inches behind the last rib in the winter fat (Xtp a picture of perfect expansion and weight retention)  those are my personal choices and the ones i would call on , the proof is always in the pudding .... And one other thought , Blackies arent that hard to lay down .... Their brown cousins on the other hand ?!!? well we all know their reputation for being tuff customers

    hope this helps,

         Default
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it on to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children what it was once like in the United States when men were free." ~Ronald Reagan

THE QUICKEST WAY TO ENSLAVE A PEOPLE IS TO DISARM THEM ~ George Mason

Offline S.B.

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3953
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #46 on: August 26, 2008, 12:18:14 PM »
Default, how much meat was destroyed with a baseball exit hole?
"The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson."
Life member of NRA, USPSA,ISRA
AF&AM #294
LIUNA #996 for the past 34 years/now retired!

Offline Ak.Hiker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 389
Re: .44 Mag Loads for bear
« Reply #47 on: August 26, 2008, 03:08:58 PM »
That 5.5 inch Redhawk is one tough 44 Magnum. It should do a good job with those heavy weight loads.