Some people would condemn a rifle that shot a 2-3" group at 100yds, fortunately there are those of us who know better. I own 2 .375 WCF, a No.3 ruger and a BB 94. I will admit I haven't shot the Winchester yet as this is going to be a cast bullet shooter and I,m slowly getting my irons out of the fire and it will soon be lapped and a mold purchased. As far as the Ruger is concerned that's a whole different subject. While I bought factory ammo to initially get the brass all those years ago I never chronographed them. Just shot 'em up. My standard load is 38 gr of RL-7 behind the 220 Hornady. My 1st Black Bear and a bunch of Wis. Whitetail fell to this combo. I mounted a 2 3/4 Redfield Wideview (remember those) on it and used to set water filled milk jugs on a fence line snow bank 150 yds from My Dads back porch, sitting with my elbows on my knees I would hit them with regularity. Inherent accuracy? What does that got to do with anything, In fact most ,if not all, the firearms I own are "not" inherently accurate, just ask the heads on my wall. Another gun writer quote that should never have been and wannabe experts have latched onto it. I've posted here before on my thoughts concerning the .375 Win. I believe it was a great cartridge for its intended purpose, but like so many others that came before and after, the writing press never, "never" gave it a chance. My BB already wears its peep sight and when it gets its chance 2-3" groups will be more than fine. I think more people should give things a try before condemning what they don't really know. They should put away the scoped heat seeking missiles and get back to hunting game instead of sniping game. In fact if 2-3" group @ 100yds is not good enough just close the distance by half, i.e. 1-1 1/2" groups now. Enjoy your Big bore, you may not know it yet but you have something very special. Good Huntn' CRASH87
