I'm wondering why anyone is even wondering about this bridge at all.
the "Bridge" was already in process before she was governor....
The tape they showed where she said "I wouldn't want to stand in the way of progress"....was only part of the tape...if they would have run it a couple seconds longer...you would have heard..."after only being on the job for 72 hours"....might be she wanted to READ something in those first 72 hours? Anyway...that was the tape the Dems played...cut and snip...you know how it goes. Like we are all too stupid to find the whole thing....like we wer all too stupid to know her first interview with Charlie was cut and snipped as well...(don't show any of that...she's good...she's REAL good...just show this")
Congress messed with the funds...shifted a lot of cost to the State, shifted the money to other things...so she killed it rather than spending the money after congress "did their thing"....
Dem's would tell you....she should have stuck to her guns and spent the money anyway...LOL! Of course...I guess that's what the Dem's would have done, spent the money anyways...or at least we know the EX governor would have....
Seems to me...if your a die hard Democrat and part of the party....you'll say she changed her mind...and at the same time give President Bush heck for never changing his mind after situations change...go figure.
basically...it does not matter much at all...it's a party against party thing...and no matter that one party does...the other party will basically do and say what they can for the smear purpose.
In other words....if a Dem would have done the exact same thing...it would have been outstanding....especially for a Dem...to not spend money. But that usually is not the case....The previous governor would have squandered the money as usual....you won't hear anyone attached to the Dem party
bring up this fact at all....or give credit to anyone that is not a democrat, no matter what they do.
So why even debate it....?
