Author Topic: compensating vs regular scopes for a 17 HMR  (Read 639 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline montveil

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 343
  • Gender: Male
compensating vs regular scopes for a 17 HMR
« on: December 05, 2008, 07:30:25 AM »
What are your feelings on a compensating scope vs regular scope for my HMR?
I have no experience with the compensating scopes
Thanks
MONTVEIL IN THE NC MOUNTAINS

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26947
  • Gender: Male
Re: compensating vs regular scopes for a 17 HMR
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2008, 07:45:30 AM »
I like the idea and bought one of the BSA Sweet 17 scopes but ended up trading off the rifle without ever firing it so the scope still sits unused where I put it after buying it. The few reports I've seen on them indicate they do what they are designed to quite well.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline KRP

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 129
Re: compensating vs regular scopes for a 17 HMR
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2008, 12:19:52 PM »
My brother has a Burris with the ballistic plex on his 17 and it works quite well for him.  I watched him put a first round hit on a rockchuck at 290 yards(I wouldn't recommend this, not much pop left at that range), and ground squirrels from 100-200 yards are common.  The biggest problem when the wind isn't blowing is the inconsistency of the ammo.

Offline backstrap

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 646
  • Gender: Male
Re: compensating vs regular scopes for a 17 HMR
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2008, 02:53:19 PM »
My bsa sweet 17 didnt work well tried it a 200 didnt work. had it dead on at a 100 yards, so i moved the turret back to a 100 and held a little high and drilled the little water battle. a better quality scope might work well but i didnt have any luck with the BSA sweet 17,in my eyes the bsa was junk
1 shot 1 kill

Offline sscoyote

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 104
Re: compensating vs regular scopes for a 17 HMR
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2008, 01:08:30 PM »
I have a 3-9x PFI Rapid Reticle (www.rapidreticle.com) on my Ruger Charger (22 LR) that works great to 200 yds. The reticle had to be recald. to the trajectory of the load, but once the profile was set up it was just fine.

Offline montveil

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 343
  • Gender: Male
Re: compensating vs regular scopes for a 17 HMR
« Reply #5 on: December 09, 2008, 04:43:13 AM »

*
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 148


View Profile Email Personal Message (Online)
   
   
Re: compensating scopes for sportster 17 hmr
« Reply #3 on: Today at 09:11:05 AM »
   

I weighed"all" the options and finally paid more than I had planned ( $160 at optics store)
I got a Muller 8.5-25X40 AO tactical with a mil dot reticle.
Reasons
more versatile as it can be used on anything except large magnums
Mil dot allows flexibility and will help in windy conditions AND THE DOT ONLY COVERS 1/4 INCH AT 25x MAGNIFICATION AT 1OO YARDS
Will focus down to 15 yards
Good name and quality.
limited lifetime warranty.

THANKS FOR ALL YOUR REPLIES AND HELP
MONTVEIL IN THE NC MOUNTAINS