max charge?
I assume you are asking about the orignal max charge that was specified. I don't know that since I haven't run across any Spanish documentation on that piece.
However I do have lots of data on British 7-pounder rifled mountain guns, several different models of which were in use between about 1865 and 1890. If I pick one of the lighter-weight barrels of that model and check the data, it should be in the ballpark for the Spanish weapon. The Spanish barrel weighs 69 Kg, or about 154 lbs.?? There should not be a difference due to barrel material, since the "compressed bronze" I think was in use in most of Europe for smaller gun tubes post-1865 had a tensile strength about equal to mild steel.
My data comes from "Treatise on the Construction and Manufacture of Ordnance in the British Service" HMSO, London, 1877.
pp. 431-432 show two different rounds provided for the "7 PR Rifled M.L. Steel Gun, 150 Lbs."
The charge used with "double shell" which I think weighed 12 lbs., was 4 oz. "F.G." powder.
For common shell, approx. 7 lbs., charge was 6 oz. "F.G." powder. I have no idea what the granulation equivalent of British 19th C. "F.G." powder is to our current powders.
The double shell would travel to 1700 yards in 17.33 sec. with elevation of 37 deg. 37 sec.
Common shell would travel to 2000 yards in 11.4 seconds with elevation of 16 degrees 0 sec.
My loading of 4.5 oz. "cannon" grade powder behind a 5.5 lb. hollow lead projectile is I think a conservative load.