I initially had set this question in terms of longevity for all-around use on the rimfire forum. The problem here is that the .22 magnum has been around since 1959 and lots of people have experience with it, while the .17 is so new, I have seen lots of activity on it with guns being bought. Fortunately the ammo is now easier to get compared to just 6 months ago, I see it at the gunshows and the local gunshops, with some variety in loadings too! I have heard of 2 guys who have used the .17 HMR to take a sizeable number of coyotes, and I have taken a crow, really tore it up on the exit wound at 90 yards using the .17 HMR!
Now that it is late August and some of us varmint hunters have seen some action, has anyone seen any difference between the .22 magnum and the .17 HMR? Punching paper at 100 yards is a different story from use in the field. The idea of having a flat shooting rifle cartridge is nice when you don't know the range, and the .22 magnum does have a trajectory drop in comparison to the .17. Do you think that the .22 magnum will decline in popularity once the .17 gets more wide spread?
CCI has also come out with some really nice hypervelocity light bullet .22 LR cartridges that hit hard and have a flatter trajectory over the old 40 grain lead bullets, like the "Velociter" and "Quickshock", do you think this could delay people from getting into the more powerful rimfire cartridges?
As a cartridge collector I see so many obsolete cartridges that have hit the dust over the years, and I believe it will take time to know for sure as the .17 HMR is new. But with all the great reviews I have heard on the .17 HMR compared to the .22 magnum rimfire. Has anyone had experiences with both where they could see a trend, taking into account similar range, animals hit, location hit, distance animal moved before dropping? Do you find that you hit the target more with the .17 HMR, etc? Likes/dislikes, etc?
Thanks