Author Topic: The Real Rescue Story  (Read 392 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline swordfish

  • Trade Count: (13)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 399
The Real Rescue Story
« on: April 20, 2009, 06:06:21 AM »
I got this e-mail this morning.
"I received this from 3 different sources, all friends, a retired USAF officer, a retired USMC officer/pilot, and a retired FBI Agent. The Agent received it from an active FBI friend who has contacts with the SEALS. I checked both Snopes (which is rumored to possibly be liberal) and Truthorfiction and found nothing on the incident. If anyone can prove this false, please advise, otherwise, please don't respond due to the many people who will be receiving this.

Having spoken to some SEAL pals here in Virginia Beach yesterday and asking why this thing dragged out for 4 days, I got the following:

1. BHO wouldn't authorize the DEVGRU/NSWC SEAL teams to the scene for 36 hours going against OSC (on scene commander) recommendation.
2. Once they arrived, BHO imposed restrictions on their ROE (Rules of Engagement) that they couldn't do anything unless the hostage's life was in "imminent" danger
3. The first time the hostage jumped, the SEALS had the raggies all sighted in, but could not fire due to ROE restriction
4. When the navy RIB Team came under fire as it approached with supplies, no fire was returned due to ROE restrictions. As the raggies were shooting at the RIB, they were exposed and the SEALS had them all dialed in.
5. BHO specifically denied two rescue plans developed by the Bainbridge CPN (Captain) and SEAL teams
6. Bainbridge CPN and SEAL team CDR (Commander) finally decide they have the OpArea and OSC authority to solely determine risk to hostage. 4 hours later, 3 dead raggies
7. BHO immediately claims credit for his "daring and decisive" behavior. As usual with him, it's BS (Bull crap).

So per our last email thread, I'm downgrading Oohbaby's performance to D-. Only reason it's not an F is that the hostage survived.

Read the following accurate account.

Philips’ first leap into the warm, dark water of the Indian Ocean hadn't worked out as well. With the
Bainbridge in range and a rescue by his country’s Navy possible, Philips threw himself off of his
lifeboat prison, enabling Navy shooters onboard the destroyer a clear shot at his captors and none
was taken.

The guidance from National Command Authority the president of the United States,
Barack Obama had been clear: a peaceful solution was the only acceptable outcome to this standoff
unless the hostage’s life was in clear, extreme danger.

The next day, a small Navy boat approaching the floating raft was fired on by the Somali pirates and
again no fire was returned and no pirates killed. This was again due to the cautious stance assumed by
Navy personnel thanks to the combination of a lack of clear guidance from Washington and a mandate
from the commander in chief’s staff not to act until Obama, a man with no background of dealing with
such issues and no track record of decisiveness, decided that any outcome other than a “peaceful
solution” would be acceptable.

After taking fire from the Somali kidnappers again Saturday night, the on-scene commander decided
he’d had enough.

Keeping his authority to act in the case of a clear and present danger to the hostage’s
life and having heard nothing from Washington since yet another request to mount a rescue operation
had been denied the day before, the Navy officer unnamed in all media reports to date decided
the AK47 one captor had leveled at Philips’ back was a threat to the hostage’s life and ordered the
NSWC team to take their shots.


Three rounds downrange later, all three brigands became enemy KIA (Killed In Action) and Philips was safe.


There is upside, downside, and spinside to the series of events over the last week that culminated in
yesterday’s dramatic rescue of an American hostage.


Almost immediately following word of the rescue, the Obama administration and its supporters claimed
victory against pirates in the Indian Ocean and [1] declared that the dramatic end to the standoff put
paid to questions of the inexperienced president’s toughness and decisiveness.


Despite the Obama administration’s (and its sycophants’) attempt to spin yesterday’s success as a result
of bold, decisive leadership by the inexperienced president, the reality is nothing of the sort.
What should have been a standoff lasting only hours as long as it took the USS Bainbridge and its
team of NSWC operators to steam to the location became an embarrassing four day and counting
standoff between a ragtag handful of criminals with rifles and a U.S. Navy warship."
"If it bleeds we can kill it" Dutch

Offline stubshaft

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 489
  • ROA's Rule
Re: The Real Rescue Story
« Reply #1 on: April 20, 2009, 09:40:27 AM »
What in the world could the obamanation expect in the way of a "peaceful" end?  Did he expect the pirates to just hand the Captain over and go away?  What promises would he have made to the pirates? Somalia? in order to secure his release.  How many years of media coverage could he expect from this?  If his wife or rugrats were in harms way you can bet your sweet a$$ that the ROE would be different.
If I agreed with you then we would both be wrong.

Offline slim rem 7

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2028
Re: The Real Rescue Story
« Reply #2 on: April 20, 2009, 10:30:09 AM »
 i hate to have to say it.. but our president is playing with some very cunning world leaders now.. he thinks he can do majyke.. i hope so..
 i suspect hes ripe fore the plucking..either that or his motives arn t altogather what he s letting the american people think they are..