No testing is done on spanish made muzzleloaders.
Randy says they ARE tested, just not the way he wants:
http://www.chuckhawks.com/unsafe_muzzleloaders.htmPlease provide links to the numerous reports that must be out there of these guns blowing up if they are unsafe.
Further, let me ask you this -- what is the tested safe load of Triple Seven or BH209 in any modern muzzleloader? From the multitude of threads out there on numerous boards asking this very question, it is obvious that once the market expanded past pyrodex ALL of the manufacturers have shied away from publishing approved max loads in their manuals even though these new powders are not equivalent (by volume) to their predecessors. We all assume 777 is 15% more powerful than pyrodex and go on our merry way. Perhaps someone has bought a gun more recently than me and they are now publishing loads for the newer powders, but I have yet to see it. Occasionally someone reports calling in and being told X or Y, but if this were tested why is it not clearly stamped on the barrel or printed in the manual?
ALL manufacturers, IMHO, are deficient in this regard.
Proofing is nothing but a minumum legal standard. If you need a proof stamped on the barrel to make you feel safe then I ask you what your max charge of BH209 is and what PSI it generates because I'd like to know and unless you know, you have no idea whether you are within proofed limits or not. Until someone does failure tests on barrels and publishes the result, we will never know the SAFE limit.