Author Topic: Two Canadian Cannons  (Read 537 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Two Canadian Cannons
« on: November 24, 2009, 08:05:46 AM »
A couple of comments about these two cannons; I believe these two guns are actually British 6-pdr field cannons, (one of my favorite barrels, BTW) and it is a shame that all the markings (including the cyphers) have vanished due to excessive polishing. It would have been of great benifit to historians if the faculty of this school had discovered another way of disciplining their students.

2 CC's

Royal Roads Military College
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline Sunrise

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
Re: Two Canadian Cannons
« Reply #1 on: November 24, 2009, 11:57:45 AM »
it is a shame that all the markings (including the cyphers) have vanished due to excessive polishing.

Adrian Caruana has warned about that sort of thing ... but peopple don't listen.  :'(

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: Two Canadian Cannons
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2009, 08:06:33 AM »
Sunrise,
I've been searching for some past threads that relate to polishing bronze guns, but haven't had any luck in finding them. A. Caruana, along with probably every other ordnance historian, archaeologist, collector, and enthusiast understands that these bronze guns should never be polished, but this still leaves us with military top brass that have a mindset that impels them to have any object that can shine, be made shiny. The other polishing offenders are of two distinct types; those that are simply ignorant, and those that have some type of compulsive disorder. The simply ignorant can be demonstrated by the real life example of the guy that polished the heck out of his Mt. Howitzer, and was then dismayed when an artillery collector told him he had significantly reduced the worth of his cannon. The compulsive disorder type of shiner is another matter entirely, but one that can be better understood by examining one of our own members (who’ll  remain nameless, so as to not cause him embarrassment) who when in the presence of any bronze, or brass object that does not blind him, falls into an incredibly profound state of depression. Yes, Victor3's (oops) absolute need to have all bronze, and brass items compete with the sun's glare is indeed very puzzling behavior, but I don’t think we should hold this against him, because it is plainly evident that he has no control over this unfortunate condition. :D
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline Double D

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12609
  • SAMCC cannon by Brooks-USA
    • South African Miniature Cannon Club
Re: Two Canadian Cannons
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2009, 08:21:28 AM »
It isn't that there is a lack of a polish-no polish policy so much as the lack of any any reference as to the proper maintainance procedure for a bronze barrel.

So General's and SGT MAJ's deem that all brass be polished.